Planned Parenthood Votes: Best ROI in Election

December 5, 2012; Source: Washington Post

In case you doubted the ability of the civil sector to organize itself for the political scene, here comes a powerful example of success. According to an analysis by the Sunlight Foundation, if you judged political effectiveness by ROI, Planned Parenthood Votes and Planned Parenthood Action surpassed all other groups active in more than one election. Planned Parenthood Votes spent a little more than $5 million and achieved a 98.45 percent ROI and Planned Parenthood Action spent almost $7 million and achieved a 98.11 percent success rate. Altogether, Planned Parenthood related groups spent $15 million, which was more than triple what it spent in 2008.

As a comparison, the largest spender listed was American Crossroads, Karl Rove’s super PAC, which spent almost $105 million and achieved a 1.29 percent success rate. Crossroads Grassroots Policy Strategies, a nonprofit social welfare organization also affiliated with Rove, spent at least another $70.7 million (although it is listed as $130 million elsewhere on the Sunlight site). Crossroads GPS is listed as having a success rate of 14.4 percent. The Sunlight Foundation figured the ROI based on “how much of their money went to support candidates who won and to oppose candidates who lost in the general election campaign.” Their figures do not include expenditures for primaries or special elections. It also did not list groups that were active in only one election.

The Planned Parenthood success, according to this article, was based on two things: using former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney’s own words against him, and employing algorithms to identify one million female voters, largely in swing states, who would be especially receptive. We would add a third: the existing constituency of women across this country that is already attached to the real value proposition of accessible reproductive services to communities. Those potentially receptive women were made all the more so through the statements of certain Republicans. Anna Greenberg of Greenberg Quinlan Rosner tracked the Internet response when such statements were made, as you can see in this graphic:

Mourdock

Overall, campaigns and outside groups reportedly spent $39 million on abortion-related ads this election cycle but the Democrats ran six times as many as Republicans and while Republican ads on abortion ran mostly during the primaries, Democrats aired theirs as the general election neared, suggesting that there was some understanding of a changing tide.

That Planned Parenthood would have had a savvy political strategy in place is not a surprise, particularly since Planned Parenthood’s Cecile Richards is the daughter of the late Ann Richards, the former governor of Texas. –Ruth McCambridge

  • Don Schlosser

    Whoa, Whoa, Whoa! The logic here (or that of Sunlight Foundation) is ALL WRONG! I am ALL IN FAVOR of the goals of the Sunlight Foundation and think we have WAAAY too much money, particularly corporate money involved in politics. Was delighted to see Rove and company take it on the chin in the last election.

    But the SUCCESS rates depend a very great deal ON THE RACES CHOSEN for backing! If you chose to contribute to candidates or porposals that were trending strong already, you would likely have a 100% Success Rate. There is no way to determine from this information whether Planned Parenthood’s “success rate” is due to good messaging, wise spending, or whether it is the result of choosing to back winners that would have won anyway and the money was actually wasted (and should have been deployed elsewhere).

    The high “ROI” is technically correct as written, it just implies EFFECTIVENESS of the spending, which CANNOT be determined from these data. These data do not support the idea that the civil sector knows how to “organize itself for success” (they don’t contradict that either, they just don’t address the question).