Health Exchanges for Small Nonprofits and Businesses Delayed

 Wait

April 1, 2013; Source: New York Times

The proportion of Americans with employment-based health insurance has been dropping during the past decade, falling to 55.1 percent as of 2011, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. That’s why the Affordable Care Act contained provisions for small firms and their employees to have a choice of plans via health insurance exchanges. However, the Obama administration has been forced to delay the implementation of this part of the national health insurance law because, according to Robert Pear in the New York Times, it wasn’t able to meet the Affordable Care Act’s deadlines.

Big businesses have the purchasing power in the marketplace to choose among competing health plans, but small businesses don’t have the capital or scale to exercise that option. The point of the ACA in this regard was to establish insurance exchanges to give small firms the ability to choose among plans. As the NPQ Newswire has previously noted, several states have declined to operate their own insurance exchanges, defaulting to the federal government’s exchange instead.  But because the administration isn’t ready, it is going to delay operating its insurance exchanges for small employers for one year, until 2015 at the earliest, in the 33 states that will be using the federal exchange.  Because the federal government is delaying its exchange, it is delaying the start-up date for state exchanges as well.

The exchanges meant to serve small businesses, called Small Business Health Options Program exchanges, or SHOP exchanges, were meant to give small employers some bargaining power with insurers, but until 2015, the exchanges will offer only one insurance plan. A choice of one is, in essence, no choice at all. The idea that small businesses would finally get a leg up was a major selling point of the law, but John C. Arensmeyer of the Small Business Majority called the delay “a major letdown for small business owners and their employees,” which is probably an understatement for small businesses that were counting on this provision.

Does it seem accurate that the only reason for the delay is the tight ACA deadline? Is it the case that, since President Obama signed the law on March 23, 2010, the administration couldn’t get the exchanges ginned up in the following three years? Without assigning causality, Pear noted that “in recent weeks, insurance companies urged the administration to delay the ‘employee choice’ option,” and cited a letter from Aetna to the administration last December suggesting that insurers’ experience with employee choice models in Massachusetts were “extremely cumbersome to establish and operate.” Were the insurers lobbying for their own interests while small businesses were counting on the administration to simply carry out the law? Three-fourths of nonprofit employers are small employers with less than 100 employees, so there is no question that many nonprofits will feel the pain of this delay.

The SHOP exchanges, supposed to be operating as of January 2014, were meant to be open to employers with less than 100 employees, though state exchanges were allowed to drop that to 50 employees through 2016. It isn’t just that the SHOP exchanges guaranteed small employers choices. They were supposed to offer apples-to-apples comparability of health insurance plans, rating plans as “bronze,” “silver,” “gold” and “platinum” based on their coverage. Any nonprofit that has struggled to figure out exactly what health insurance plans cover would get all kinds of help and support in the SHOP exchanges. Add the SHOP exchanges delay to the bad news nonprofit employers already received: the sequester cut the Small Business Health Care Credit, which is already lower for nonprofit employers than for-profit employers, by 8.7 percent. Put it all together and the ACA’s capacity to increase affordability for small employers and their employees is rapidly shrinking. —Rick Cohen

  • Bob R

    Once again the media, and the inaccurate echo chamber of the blogosphere, is creating more confusion than providing answers. The small group exchange is not going away as reported on multiple blogs today. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has simply announced that one of the options planned for small group insurance though federally operated exchanges will be delayed until 2015.

    Under what is referred to as the “choice option,” small employers would be able to select a level of coverage (i.e. bronze, silver, gold, or platinum coverage tier), and participating employees would be allowed to choose from any carrier offering coverage within that tier.

    Small employers will still be able to purchase small group plans though the federal exchange, but for 2014 all participating employees would be covered by the particular plan chosen by the employer (as they are now in the regular small group market in most cases).

    There have always been big questions about how competitive the plans available on the federal small group exchange will be. I for one think it will be a challenge for exchanges to capture a large % of the small group market in many states. In almost all states, insurance companies will also continue to offer small group plans directly to employers outside the exchange. (Sorry…but my friends in Vermont will only be able to purchase small group plans through the state exchange)

    Once again, as news bounces around the internet it is like that game of telephone we used to play as kids! This announcement is is being made to sound like a much bigger deal that it really is. The choice option might be nice, but it is not the end of the world for small employers that it is not there.

  • rick cohen

    thanks for your note, Bob. The base article is from the NYT. I think that the issue is not that any one thing is so devastating, but the accumulation of issues like this one just pile up reducing the benefits of the ACA. I think the quote from the small business trade group that supported the ACA, expressing disappointment–that I quoted in my piece–said it well. I think Sen. Landrieu’s comments were also important (unfortunately for space I didn’t quote those). I’m pretty sure my article said that the exchanges were delayed until 2015, not going away forever. Thanks again for your comments.