Nonprofit Newswire | Long-Time Charter School Hawk Has Change of Heart

Print Share on LinkedIn More
Subscribe via E-Mail Get the newswire delivered to you – free! {source} [[form name=”ccoptin” action=”http://visitor.constantcontact.com/d.jsp” target=”_blank” method=”post”]] [[input type=”text” name=”ea” size=”20″ value=”” style=”font-family:Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:10px; border:1px solid #999999;”]] [[input type=”submit” name=”go” value=”GO” class=”submit” style=”font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:10px;”]] [[input type=”hidden” name=”m” value=”1101451017273″]] [[input type=”hidden” name=”p” value=”oi”]] [[/form]] {/source} Subscribe via RSS Subscribe via RSS Submit a News Item Submit a News Item

March 9, 2010; Wall Street Journal | Diane Ravitch is a long-time educator, a former assistant secretary of the Department of Education under President George H.W. Bush, an ally of conservative educator Chester Finn of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute (Ravitch was a founding board member), and a longtime advocate of charter schools. In an op-ed published in the Wall Street Journal, Ravitch disowns her support of the nation’s 5,000 charter schools, despite the advent of President Obama, a liberal Democrat who is supporting charters with more vigor than Bush I, Clinton, or Bush II did in their administrations.

Ravitch claims that the idea that charters “would unleash a new era of innovation and effectiveness” has not been met and will not be. “The only major national evaluation of charter schools,” according to Ravitch, found 17% of charter schools performing better than traditional public schools, 46% the same as public schools, and 37% significantly worse.

She further notes that charters enroll smaller proportions of students with limited English speaking skills and students with disabilities, and that many charters “counsel out” the lowest performing students. Rather than significantly improving education, Ravitch contends that they only “tinker around the edges of the system,” affect the lives of only a few students, and have no beneficial impact on the other 97% of students attending regular public schools.

She concludes that charters contribute to “creating a private sector that will undermine public education without improving it.” This is a damning critique from a former unabashed supporter of charter schools and the panoply of conservative policy solutions to public education.

Nonprofits that have bought into the charter school promise would be well advised to read her new book, “The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education.”—Rick Cohen

  • Karin Wandrei, PhD

    While I’m not sure I agree with her total critique, the charters I have seen locally have a reputation for having the best students. I am impressed with someone in a high policy position publically being able to change her mind. We need to see more of this in government.

  • rick cohen

    What is nice about your comment and about Ravitch’s article is a recognition that sometimes, it’s very useful to look at the data, the evidence, and see if that makes you reconsider previously held conclusions. In a political environment where leaders talk about the importance of evidence-based decision-making, there often isn’t much. We at NPQ tend to like writing pieces where the evidence takes us to “aha” moments as opposed to writing conclusions and then hoping that the evidence matches. Wish more of us had Ravitch-style aha moments.