Nonprofit Newswire | CEO Compensation at Boys & Girls Clubs

Print Share on LinkedIn More
Subscribe via E-Mail Get the newswire delivered to you – free! {source} [[form name=”ccoptin” action=”http://visitor.constantcontact.com/d.jsp” target=”_blank” method=”post”]] [[input type=”text” name=”ea” size=”20″ value=”” style=”font-family:Verdana,Geneva,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:10px; border:1px solid #999999;”]] [[input type=”submit” name=”go” value=”GO” class=”submit” style=”font-family:Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size:10px;”]] [[input type=”hidden” name=”m” value=”1101451017273″]] [[input type=”hidden” name=”p” value=”oi”]] [[/form]] {/source} Subscribe via RSS Subscribe via RSS Submit a News Item Submit a News Item

March 12, 2009; Washington Post | Talk about bad timing! Four GOP senators have declared that without more information about how the Boys & Girls Clubs can account for paying CEO Roxane Spillett about $988,000 in 2008, they intend to stop action on a bill that would provide $425 million in federal funds to the youth-serving organization.

The Washington Post reports that Republican Senators Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Tom Coburn of Oklahoma, John Kyl of Arizona, and John Cornyn of Texas, have written to the charity’s board of governors asking for more information about the compensation package. The four also have questions about some $6.5 million in travel and lobbying expenses and how the national group makes grants to local clubs.

Adding to the senators’ ire is the fact the Boys & Girls Clubs, which receives nearly 40 percent of its revenue from the federal government, posted a $13 million loss in 2008. In their letter, the senators wrote, “We find it hard to reconcile this loss given the amount spent on executive salaries, perks and lobbying expenses. We are especially concerned because it is our understanding that some independent clubs have closed or are on the cusp of closing because of a lack of funding.”

The Boys & Girls Club issued a statement last week that said Spillett was paid $360,774 in base salary in 2008 and a $150,000 incentive and nearly $478,000 in benefits, expenses and contributions to a deferred retirement plan. According to Charity Navigator, which tracks on its Web site how much nonprofit CEOs earn, compensation for executives at nonprofits with more than $100 million dollars in annual revenue averages $460,000, including deferred compensation.

“When you have someone who is making double that amount it defies logic. It damages the public trust,” said Ken Berger, Charity Navigator’s president and CEO. The Associated Press also quoted Berger saying: “The people who use our site, donors, would be appalled by a salary like this. If you want to be a millionaire, go and work in the for-profit sector.”  Clearly, the actions of the Boys & Girls Clubs show that they think their CEO is worth a private sector salary, even if a group of angry senators don’t.—Bruce Trachtenberg

  • Lindsay

    I would be interested to see what percentage of the Boys & Girls Club’s annual budget her salary represents. She’s the head of a huge organization, she works hard, and she clearly brings in lots of money. She should be compensated accordingly.

    Also, I hate Ken Berger’s statement, it’s completely ignorant. JUST BECAUSE WE WORK FOR NONPROFITS DOESN’T MEAN WE SHOULD BE WORKING FOR NOTHING. If the board decides that she has earned it, then she should get it. I’m tired of being told that I should receive less compensation than someone who works in the for-profit sector when I do great work and I do just as much or more work than those workers. Berger is also blaming this situation on Spillett. Her compensation was most likely voted on by the board, so why isn’t he attacking them for a “lack of oversight”?

  • docword

    What strikes me as the most outrageous thing about the senators demands is that clearly the people who will suffer if the funding is withdrawn are the clients. Instead, the senators could try to work toward a solution that could benefit the organization and control what they believed is excessive salary. Instead they are proposing to cut funding which will likely lead to the outcome of club closings which they claim they are upset over. It all feels like convenient political theater to me. . .not an attempt to really solve problems.