New Congressional Budget Office Report Sounds the Alarm over Deficits

Print Share on LinkedIn More

June 22, 2011; Source: Congressional Budget Office (PDF) | The new Congressional Budget Office report on the nation’s long term debt has provoked lots of spin from the left and right cable TV shows and would have gotten more hadn’t President Obama stolen the limelight by announcing a modest withdrawal of troops (but not non-governmental private contractors) from Afghanistan. Since NPQ Newswire readers from across the ideological spectrum have debated on our website issues of governmental spending, taxation, and debt as they affect nonprofits, the CBO findings should provoke more debate. Here’s what the CBO said:

  • Through 2008, federal debt equaled 40 percent of the nation’s GDP, pretty close to the 40-year average of 37 percent since 1945. At the end of this year, federal debt will be approximately 70 percent of GDP.
  • Spending on mandatory health care programs (i.e., those that do not require annual appropriations, such as Medicare, Medicaid, the Children’s Health Insurance Program, and health insurance subsidies established by the national health insurance reform legislation) will rise from 6 percent of GDP today to 9 percent of GDP in 2035. Together with Social Security, their part of GDP would rise from 10 percent now to 15 percent 25 years from now.
  • The expiration of the Bush era tax cuts enacted in 2001 that President Obama largely extended in 2010 will lead to tax revenues equaling 23 percent of GDP in 2035. If the tax cuts are extended again and if the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) is not expanded, revenues will be closer to their historical average of 18 percent of GDP.
  • If revenues are at the 18 percent level and mandatory expenditures increase as predicted, if not even faster, the CBO suggests that debt as a percent of GDP will surpass its historical high point of 109 percent by 2023 and approach 190 percent by the year 2035.

The CBO predicts the following consequences from higher debt levels:

  1. “Rising debt would increasingly restrict policymakers’ ability to use tax and spending policies to respond to unexpected challenges, such as economic downturns or financial crises. As a result, the effects of such developments on the economy and people’s well-being could be worse.”
  2. “Growing debt also would increase the probability of a sudden fiscal crisis, during which investors would lose confidence in the government’s ability to manage its budget and the government would thereby lose its ability to borrow at affordable rates. Such a crisis would confront policymakers with extremely difficult choices. To restore investors’ confidence, policymakers would probably need to enact spending cuts or tax increases more drastic and painful than those that would have been necessary had the adjustments come sooner.”
  3. “To keep deficits and debt from climbing to unsustainable levels, policymakers will need to increase revenues substantially as a percentage of GDP, decrease spending significantly from projected levels, or adopt some combination of those two approaches.”

What do NPQ Newswire readers think? Is the debt crisis taking us toward a future like Greece or Ireland, or is it an overblown policy canard that could be reduced mightily, as this graphic from the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities suggests, by ending this nation’s long-running wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and by undoing the Bush/Obama tax cuts?

CBPP Analysis of Factors Driving Budget Deficits, 2001-2019

Weigh in, all you shy, retiring, reticent NPQ Newswire readers!—Rick Cohen

  • Paul Tysse

    The deficit was created by massive war spending, high-end tax cuts, and the resultant extreme recession, with lower tax revenues. The deficit is way over-blown as an issue. If we institute a huge new stimulus program ($1-2 trillion) and eliminate the Bush tax cuts, the deficit will take care of itself, and the economy will be back.

  • Kukurio

    The CBO also noted that if Congress does nothing, the deficit will be eliminated by the end of Obama’s second term. Meanwhile, Republicans are insisting that Medicare be eliminated and replaced with a voucher system in order to prevent a return to the policies of the 90s.

    The conservative media is not doing its job of informing the populace of this simple fact. The fastest way to eliminate the deficit is not to end Medicare, it’s to send Congress on a five-year vacation.

  • R. Ruth Linden

    I don’t know about a five-year vacation for Congress but I am otherwise in full agreement with the previous two commentators. This country is simply not in a position to finance wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere around the world.


  • Kelly Kleiman

    As any professional economist who isn’t on the payroll of the Heritage Foundation will tell you, deficit spending on infrastructure is the appropriate remedy for recession/depression. As we’re in one of those, we should be spending accordingly. Tax cuts, by contrast, are simply a system of transferring wealth to the wealthy, having failed time and again to produce jobs or any other relief from economic hardship. So this is more than merely a phony issue–it’s a phony issue created for the purpose of destroying programs which constitute social security (in its broadest sense).

    Definitely we could do with less war spending. And probably we could reduce military support to Israel, possibly even as a technique for pressuring the Netanyahu government to make peace. But I really think references to “the Zionist project”–by which I understand Ms. Linden to mean “the recognition of the state of Israel”–are counterproductive.

  • rick cohen

    Thanks for weighing in, Kelly. You’ll see in my next Cohen Report I have some pointed comments about the necessary budget actions to help this nation slog through the still deepening recession.