The Food Stamp Program – Unsustainable or Untouchable?

Print Share on LinkedIn More

July 14, 2011; Source: The Economist | In April 2011, one in seven Americans was depending on food stamps. The program cost has increased from $35 billion in 2008 to $65 billion this year. Leaders in Washington view this program as either unsustainable or as untouchable. Meanwhile, it’s a lifeline for millions of struggling individuals and families.

House of Representative Republicans have proposed to cut the food stamp budget by a fifth in future budgets. Additionally, they want turn the program over to the states in the form of block grants with each state receiving predetermined fixed amount, irrespective of state needs. They have already voted to cut the Women and Infant Children’s program (WIC) by 11 percent. The Senate is unlikely to approve this.

Advocates argue that these cuts would hurt a program that is working. Eligibility is based on income with the average monthly benefit of $133.  Half of the recipients are children and another 8 percent are elderly. Forty-one percent have income less than the poverty level.

Program proponents also note:

  • Food stamps ensure these individuals who have lost their unemployment benefits won’t go hungry.
  • The rapid growth of the Food Stamp program shows it’s working.  Block grant programs grow much more slowly in hard times and don’t match the demand.
  • Food stamps re-energize local economies. A recent study by Moody’s concluded that food stamps were the most effective stimulus, increasing economic activity $11 for every dollar spent. Most tax cuts yielded a dollar or less.
  • Only two-thirds of Americans eligible for food stamps have signed up.

In this tough economy, many more Americans – especially children and the elderly – are depending on our government to put food on their table. Is this the kind of budget cut that is good for our fellow citizens?—Nancy Knoche

  • david r reisman

    this article is the absolute truth…food stamps are a true benefit to the people of this country….consider the billions and trillions spent on our current wars….all of it a total waste…. 🙂

  • Taxed More

    The rapid growth of the Food Stamp program shows it

  • Taxed More

    Are only comments that 100% agree with the article accepted?

  • Sharon Charters

    I’m very sure that the food stamp program is important and beneficial, even critical, to the people who receive this assistance. What is unfortunate is that it is based on a negative stereotype that says poor people cannot be trusted to manage their money. A system that provides a guaranteed income would make the need for food stamps unnecessary and be far less stigmitizing

  • Mike Moore

    Hummm, didnt we just give 500 million to Somalia for food? We have people starving here at home. Should we not take care of our own first rather than war lords and pirates families?

  • American

    Taxed More — yes – you cannot post anything dissenting on NPQ articles — typical of truly leftist orgs — mislead by omitting truth and “the other voice”… I for one am not seeing how food stamps are stimulating the economy — they just keep many disinterested in fending for themselves and allowing others to pay their way….

  • Peter R

    Hey there Taxed More the food stamp program is successful it has helped a lot of people I am one of them I am 60 years old and I have worked all my life untill my place of work closed and left me in the cold so dont you sit there and write that I am looking for a hand out I hope your rich so you dont have to recieve food stamps