Charitable Money Flowed to Second Mile During State’s Three-Year Investigation of Sandusky

Print Share on LinkedIn More

November 15, 2011; Source: Centre Daily TimesA youth services nonprofit such as Second Mile had to have had a number of grants and contracts from the state government, but the Pennsylvania websites for researching state agency grants aren’t particularly helpful for the casual web visitor. Fortunately, the Centre Daily Times and other Pennsylvania press are on the Sandusky scandal as central Pennsylvania’s biggest cause célèbre, and they’re finding some of the state grants and contracts the state. A $3 million state grant to Second Mile, approved as an “optional” grant by Governor Tom Corbett, was just nixed—or at least put on hold—by Centre County officials. The grant would have gone toward the construction of a $9 million, 45,000-square-foot Second Mile learning center slated to open in 2013. The Daily Times quotes State Senator Jake Corman suggesting that it might be difficult for Second Mile to raise the matching funds in the wake of the Sandusky scandal. The newspaper didn’t mention that Corman was a board member of the charity and has donated money from his campaign funds to Second City programs.

Governor Corbett—until 2010 Attorney General Corbett—has taken his share of criticism for letting the Sandusky investigation run for three-years before shutting Sandusky down and refusing to say whether Sandusky was even under state surveillance during those years. Some might also decry Corbett’s tepid support—as a Penn State trustee—of Penn State football coach Joe Paterno and university president Graham Spanier, voting to have both men sacked, but hardly taking a vocal lead in the board’s deliberations. But information about grants that Second Mile might have garnered from the state over the years will have to come from the specific state agencies in charge of monitoring the expenditures.

For individual contributors, the cascading news about Second Mile has to be heartbreaking. No one gives to a youth charity expecting the kinds of things that Sandusky is charged with having done. Second Mile board members and executives are now suffering memory lapses about the times that the organization was told by prosecutors about Sandusky’s alleged crimes. When AG Corbett was investigating Sandusky in 2009 and 2010, or when prosecutors were confronting Sandusky with the evidence of his misbehavior years before, it seems obvious that foundation funders of the organization might not have known—and they’re probably steaming that no one bothered to tell them. We found over $1.6 million in foundation grants flowing to Second Mile from roughly 2004 to 2010. None of the grants are mammoth, but for small family foundations and some corporate foundations, the Sandusky scandal might add a new patina of cynicism and distrust that the nonprofit sector writ large neither needs nor deserves. The major funders we found of Second Mile were these:



Grants 2004–2010

Years of Grants

Highmark Foundation



Bank of America Charitable Foundations



Citi Foundation



Susquehanna Bank Foundation



Struthers Family Foundation



Ferguson Foundation


2004–2006 and 2008

Hamer Foundation


2005 and 2007–2009

Wal-Mart Foundation



Hall Foundation



Caritas Foundation



Louis E. Silvi Foundation



The Brook J. Lenfest Foundation



The Jane K. Lowe Charitable Foundation



Salvaggio Family Foundation




Given that the Sandusky investigation by the AG’s office had been ongoing for the past three years and prosecutors had brought allegations of Sandusky to the attention of the charity years before, there is a degree of government responsibility here. The state of Pennsylvania suspected something was wrong, had evidence that something bad was happening, and had raised the issues directly with the charity, but no one appears to have bothered telling the family and corporate foundations that something might have been rotten at the intersection of Second Mile and Penn State. —Rick Cohen 

  • Michael Wyland


    The Second Mile’s web site makes an explicit point of referring to its exclusive reliance on private support for its programs and services. From the home page:

    “The Second Mile

  • rick cohen

    Michael: Thanks for your comment. When I searched for government grants and contracts for Second Mile through two state databases, I only found one very small grant and no mention of the $3 million. So I was equally surprised. The fact that it was described as an “optional” grant directed or authorized by the Governor makes me think that it is sort of like those NYS legislative discretionary grants (“members items”) which don’t go through any process of review or vetting. I’ve looked at these off-process grants over the years and they are very hard in some states to track, but I’ve never seen one anywhere this large. All surprising to me. There’s more to the Second Mile story, I’m sure.

  • Dave Wasko

    The Second Mile had records stored at the off-site storage of Automated Records Centre which is named as a company providing in-kind services to the Second Mile. Automated Records Centre is owned by Mike Sullivan who not only was a “volunteer of the year”, program coordinator, member of the Sandusky Society but is also a regional and state director of the Second Mile. Automated Records Centre advertises the most secure place for your records in PA. Any thoughts come to mind about the missing records the Attorney General is looking for?

  • Ray Blehar

    The true intersection of The Second Mile and Penn State has never been reported by the media.

    The fact of the matter is that Louis Freeh and the Harrisburg Patriot News were part of making sure no one would find out what it was.