Women’s History Month Ushered in with Contraception Smackdown in Senate

Print Share on LinkedIn More

March 1, 2012; Source: New York Times

The United States celebrated the first day of Women’s History Month with a legislative fight about contraception. The Senate narrowly nixed a measure that would have allowed religious based organizations—such as nonprofit Catholic charities and hospitals—to exclude health coverage for birth control for employees under the Health Care Reform Act. The vote was 51 to 48 against the amendment, which was proposed by Sen. Roy Blunt (R-Mo.) and had been tacked onto a highway bill.

Lest you think the worst was over on this issue, here is how the vote was headlined in the Christian Post: “Senate Aborts GOP Amendment on Birth Control, Religious Liberties.” A CBS News/New York Times survey, done in mid-February, found that 61 percent of the public favors the mandate for coverage of contraception and 31 percent oppose it. It further found that Catholics support the requirement at about the same rate as all Americans, though Roman Catholic leaders are pushing for the exemption.

The U.S. Senate includes 17 women, of which 12 are Democrats. Crossing the aisles, three of those Democrats voted for the amendment and one female Republican voted against it. Since this is Women’s History Month, let’s look at statements by some of the women involved in the debate on the Blunt amendment:

  • Sen. Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), who voted for the measure, said, “Many have tried to characterize this amendment as denying women access to contraception. That’s false. This measure simply allows health care providers and companies to have the same conscience rights they had before the president’s health care bill took effect.”
  • Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), an advocate for abortion rights and access to health care, was the only Republican to vote with the majority of Democrats against the measure. Snowe recently told MSNBC that she “did agree with what the president had done with respect to the mandatory requirement.” Snowe has just announced she will not stand for re-election, citing the partisanship of the legislative process as her reason. Her seat is seen as likely to be claimed by a Democrat.
  • Senator Barbara A. Mikulski (D-Md.) said Republicans were attacking women’s health care as part of “a systematic war against women.”
  • Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of Health and Human Services, urged defeat of the measure, saying, “The Obama administration believes that decisions about medical care should be made by a woman and her doctor, not a woman and her boss.” –Ruth McCambridge
  • Mike huggins

    More appalling than the Senate debates were the disgusting comments made by Limbaugh directed at the young woman who is a law student at Georgetown. And even more disturbing than Limbaugh’s abusive comments has been the silence from state and national legislative leaders their failure to hold Limbaugh accountable for his language.Failure to reject such egregious examples of incivility is a serious failure of leadership by any who would aspire to lead their community, their district, their state, or their nation.

    Clearly genuine leadership to restore balance in our public discourse about women’s rights will once again have to come from eveyday people, not touts for the ideological factions dominating and distorting our public sphere.There will be a political accounting for those in the Senate, the House, and the many state legislatures who turn a bling eye to justice.The mills do sometimes grind slow, but they will grind exceedingly fine