Should Inmates in Prison Earn a Living Wage?

Print Share on LinkedIn More


April 2, 2015; ThinkProgress

Yes, yes, we have all heard. This past winter in Boston was a doozy—apparently so much so that before the second of the four blizzards in February, the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) “hired” inmates to help dig out train stations. A public records request from ThinkProgress revealed that more than 90 inmates worked through subzero temperatures and earned between to $3 to $4 a day.

Although the news of inmates shoveling MBTA stops broke back in February, emails and MBTA internal documents recently retrieved by ThinkProgress revealed the details of the collaboration between the MBTA and the Massachusetts Department of Corrections (DOC), including who would be funding the equipment, protective wear, and the “daily inmate wage” for the inmates. In one of the emails, Michelle Goldman from the Homeland Security department relayed questions about getting the inmates better snow gear.

According to a spokesman for the DOC, regardless of the conditions and concerns expressed in the emails, the “equipment did not change depending on the day, location, or availability.” Back in February, Suffolk County inmates from a minimum-security prison volunteered as part of the Community Work Program, an initiative allows inmate nearing the end of their sentence to work to help finish neighboring community projects.

The idea came from Mayor Marty Walsh’s office as a way of using resources more efficiently. A note from February on the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office website quoted Walsh:

“Creating opportunities for our inmates to give back to our community is an important component in successful re–entry,” said Mayor Walsh. “I am thrilled that the City is able to partner with the Suffolk County Sheriff’s Office to assist in snow removal in areas critical to the safety of our residents.”

The DOC spokesman also told ThinkProgress that inmates voluntarily opted into the program and that they were earning their daily inmate wage, which ranges from $3 to $4.

Now, don’t be fooled by these numbers; three or four dollars per day can be a lot of money by prison standards. There hasn’t been a significant amount of research, but numbers from 2002 indicate the average American inmate in a state prison could make anywhere from $0.30 to $7.00 an hour. Federal inmates have a more narrow range, from $0.18 to $1.15 per hour. These numbers haven’t changed a lot in the last 13 years. Of course, compared to the $30 that the MBTA was offering everyone else, it’s not much at all.

The concept of prison labor dates back to the Reconstruction and Jim Crow eras, spanning the late 1800s and the early 20th century, where prison work was essentially “slavery by another name,” according to historian Douglas Blackmon. “Convict-leasing,” as it was known, allowed mostly black inmates to be leased out involuntarily to private companies to work in coalmines, plantations, and factories. While the inmates were treated horribly and worked in terrible conditions, it was incredibly profitable for the states and private companies.

According to Blackmon, inmates “were compelled to labor without compensation, were repeatedly bought and sold, and were forced to do the bidding of white masters through the regular application of extraordinary physical coercion.” While today prisoners work voluntarily rather than being forced, the parallels are hard to ignore, especially given the extremely low wages as compared to outside society.

Should inmates be paid more? What is the proper wage to pay inmates? How are these wages to be calculated—state by state? By the inmate? By the job they are assigned? Inmates don’t necessarily need much money, as they’re not paying taxes or for their room and board. Aside from items they can buy within the prison system, what purpose is served by paying a more significant wage?

Consider how important it is that inmates maintain or develop a productive work ethic prior to being released back into society. For the for-profit industries that invest in prison labor, consider how inmates could be motivated with a more reasonable salary. Earning a living would be particularly important for any inmate who enters without a support system or any kind of savings to help them adjust once they are released. We already know the impact that an incarceration record can have on a former inmate’s job prospects, but how do these low wages factor into their post-release attitude?

All of this must be balanced with the realities of paying inmates more. A past study by the U.S. Government Accountability Office from 1993 entertained the idea of paying prison labor minimum wage. Although perhaps too old a study to be relevant, the report did predictably find a significant difference between what prisons were paying at the time for prison labor and what they would have to pay with a minimum wage—a difference of millions of dollars. To the extent that it’s possible to pay inmates more, however, hinges at least in part on whether it’s a worthwhile venture.

The unfortunate truth is that the system knows that once stripped of their basic freedom, it does not take much money to employ inmates and give them a glimpse of civilized society. These considerations come back to whether we as a society want to invest and reform the prison system, rather than using the facilities as temporary solutions to a much larger problem.—Shafaq Hasan

  • Rachel Brookhart

    Helping inmates earn (and save) money while they are in prison, might be a huge step in decreasing the rates of recidivism. When these prisoners get out of jail they need to find places to live and work, which is difficult with a record. Having some savings might give them the cushion they need to get them out of the cycle of crime.

    As for “should they make a living wage” – yes. Everyone should. I’m not sure what’s so difficult about that concept. And I’m not sure why people think it’s ok to treat prisoners as “less than” just because they are in jail. Yes, they committed a crime, but they are already being punished for that and treating them like dirt isn’t going to help rehabilitation.

  • Eugene Priester, III/ Abdul Muhaymin

    I would like to speak with Mr. Hasan about adding more depth to his article. I have not too long ago been released from Federal prison and there is a good deal I believe that he can add to his article in addition to considering regarding some questions and issues that he raised.
    Thank you for your time. I look forward to hearing from him or you soon. 912-308-3712

  • Diana Robinson

    Rachel hit the nail on the head. Upon release some prisoners are on parole, and will be told where they may or may not live, and others have “maxed out” and are not on parole. Either way they have to find somewhere to live, and often it is not able to be with their families, for a variety of reasons. Many end up in shelters that are humiliating in their conditions, and put them in close contact with others who are also on parole, and with whom they should not be socializing. by terms of their parole. And from all this they have to wait through the delays involved in getting on welfare, try to find work, and in the meantime live somewhere. Or they may be forbidden by parole from getting work until they have been through certain mandated programs – mental health, addiction, anger management, etc. Obviously they need some way to support themselves. If they have saved some money they can at least buy toothpaste – which could make the difference between a good impression at a job interview and not.

    The issue is how much they should earn AFTER calculating that they do not have to pay for food and lodging while in prison.

  • Benjamin de Menil

    The article mentions a $4 / day wage for prison workers shoveling out Boston’s T stations and then states that $3-$4/hr is a higher than normal wage for prisoners. which is it? $4/day or $4/hr?