Skip to content
Donate Now
  • Donate Now
  • logo
  • logo
  • News
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising
    • Crowdfunding
    • Development
    • Donor Retention
  • Philanthropy
    • Philanthropy
    • Foundations
    • Grantmaking
    • Online Giving
  • Management
    • Management
    • Board Governance
    • Finance
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Policy
    • Policy
    • Activism
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Government
    • Healthcare
    • Taxes
  • Webinars
    • Premium Webinars
  • Magazine
  • Opinion
    • Editor’s Notes
    • The Cohen Report
    • Dr. Conflict
    • The Nonprofit Ethicist
    • Unraveling Development
    • Voices from the Field
  • Store
  • Donate Now

  • Subscribe
  • Member Log in
  • Manage Subscription
Link to subscription form
  • News
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising
    • Crowdfunding
    • Development
    • Donor Retention
  • Philanthropy
    • Philanthropy
    • Foundations
    • Grantmaking
    • Online Giving
  • Management
    • Management
    • Board Governance
    • Finance
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Policy
    • Policy
    • Activism
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Government
    • Healthcare
    • Taxes
  • Webinars
    • Premium Webinars
  • Magazine
  • Opinion
    • Editor’s Notes
    • The Cohen Report
    • Dr. Conflict
    • The Nonprofit Ethicist
    • Unraveling Development
    • Voices from the Field
  • Store
  • My Menu

The Creepy “First Other” Narrative on Nonprofit Boards

By Ruth McCambridge Ruth McCambridge | January 23, 2019
Share34
Tweet12
Email
Share
46 Shares

January 22, 2019; Westword (Denver, CO)

Lately, the proud heralding of “first” others—people of color, women, etc.—in responsible positions in these United States is becoming tainted with the query, “And why not yesterday? Last year? Seven decades ago?” This story from Colorado exhibits the tone we wish the sector had already grown out of. But, as we have been reporting for some time, the failure of so many to achieve equity, diversity, and inclusion in board and leadership positions in the nonprofit sector is a clear testament to a lack of consciousness and accountability that should be a little painful by now.

This particular media account addressed the appointment of the first refugee board member to one of Colorado’s three resettlement agencies, calling it a historic moment:

In fiscal year 2017, the organization resettled 1,575 refugees across five offices, including one in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

However, despite its expansive work with refugees, Lutheran Family Services [Rocky Mountains] had never had a refugee serve on its board.

Far be it from us to even inadvertently shame an organization that is at least trying to change its game, but the narrative that has accompanied this story is not what it needs to be in the least.

“It has long been my desire to have a refugee voice on the board of directors,” says Jim Barclay, the president of Lutheran Family Services Rocky Mountains. “The challenge that I’ve had in the past has been being able to identify a refugee who had been here long enough to stabilize their livelihood.” Barclay started with the organization in 2001, and in FY 2017 alone the organization resettled 1,575 refugees across five offices.

This explanation sounds suspiciously familiar, having been floated by many other nonprofit leaders over a matter of decades. But no matter which way you turn it, it is unacceptable, working as it does into an odd “othering” of people who have shown through their actions their willingness to take agency in the world. Perhaps a mea culpa for bad past practice would be in order.

It is time for this sector to own the mental models from which such narratives emerge and understand how unwelcoming and disrespectful they are to those “others” you might otherwise be able to team up with as peers. These kinds of stories should be thinner on the ground.—Ruth McCambridge

Share34
Tweet12
Email
Share
46 Shares

About Ruth McCambridge

Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor in Chief of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

  • More by Ruth

Read Next

  • How to Hack a Narrative: Parkland Fathers Speak at House Gun Violence Hearing

    When a US congressman claimed that saving people from “illegal alien” attacks with a border wall was a higher priority than stopping mass shootings, two fathers of slain children called BS.

Popular Posts

  • The 2019 Gates Letter: What Surprises Them Scares Us
  • Green New Deal Bill Introduced in Congress
  • Cash Flow in the Nonprofit Business Model: A Question of Whats and Whens
  • Scaling Social Justice: A Latinx Immigrant Worker Co-op Franchise Model
  • Mission Haiku: the Poetry of Mission Statements
  • Special Message: The Risk to Democracy in Trump’s National Emergency

Write for NPQ

  • Our Mission
  • Advertise
  • Board of Directors
  • Foundations and Funders
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • NPQ Staff
  • Contact Us
  • Press Release
  • Donors
  • Newsletters
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy

  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Back to top ↑

To Access the Full Article, Please Login or Subscribe

Can't Login?

Register a New Account Forgot Password

Continue Reading