logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

Nonprofit Newswire | Editorial Writers Decry Perceived Benefit to Nonprofit Lenders

Bruce S Trachtenberg
March 26, 2010

March 25, 2010; Wall Street Journal | When it comes to the Democrats, President Obama, and what it perceives as the administration’s anti-business stance, you can always count on a howl from the Wall Street Journal‘s editorial page, even if the action getting attention might help out some nonprofits.

Giving commentators a headache this time is what the newspaper’s editorial writers claim will be a “huge gift” from Washington to nonprofits that originate student loans. The Journal says that as part of the reconciliation process to change the health-care bill, a plan “hitched to ObamaCare” will ban private companies from originating federally guaranteed loans. The Journal calls a “fairy tale that cutting out the private-lender middlemen will save billions every year as students borrow directly from the feds.”

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Rather than saving money, the editorial writers show their deeply conservative stripes, charging that the change is nothing more than another anti-business strike by the administration and its Democratic supporters in the Senate. The editorial states, “While Democrats are eliminating a revenue stream at for-profit companies, they are simultaneously creating another one for a handful of favored nonprofit companies.” Later, it adds, “And you thought Democrats didn’t like business.” I guess that’s what you call a difference of opinion.—Bruce Trachtenberg

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

You might also like
Whose Solidarity? Race, Colonialism, Economy, and the Global South
Omar Freilla
Restoring Agency, Redefining Development in Richmond, CA
Kelsey Boyd
How MediaJustice Is Leading Communities to Push Back Against AI Data Centers
Myaisha Hayes
Reclaiming the Spaces that Once Confined Women Against Their Will
Michelle Browder
How to Use Art Spaces to Build Civic and Political Power
Tom Tresser
Standing Up for Food Justice in a Time of Fear: Pandemic Reflections
Chase Louden

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
December 9th, 2:00 pm ET

Nonprofit Safety & Security: Protecting Our People, Data, and Organizations in a Time of Unprecedented Threat

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Future is Collective

Register

    
You might also like
An image of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
University Professors Are Latest Targets of FOIA Requests
Rebekah Barber
During a protest, a person holds up a cardboard sign that reads, “No Justice No Peace.”
What Is “Civil Society”—and How Is It Under Threat?
Rebekah Barber
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, " Isaiah Thompson: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025 (So Far): Isaiah Thompson
Isaiah Thompson

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.