One Nonprofit’s Experience in Renaming Itself

Print Share on LinkedIn More


October 26, 2012; Source: Albany Democrat-Herald

An Albany, Ore.-area nonprofit that has been working with developmentally disabled adults for some 35 years is undergoing a name change. Center Enterprises is becoming Co-Opportunity, Inc., and the switch raises some interesting questions about nonprofit naming strategies. The group’s operations director, Charles Edelson, discussed the name change on a local sports radio call-in show and explained, according to the Albany Democrat-Herald, that the name Center Enterprises “didn’t signify anything” whereas the new name “suggests cooperation and images of opportunity.”

Here’s where it gets interesting: according to the Democrat-Herald, “Coming up with the new name took several months and different ideas were considered. Executive Director Susan Kehoe eventually saw the name being used by an east coast organization and thought it fit.” That East Coast organization is Co-Opportunity, a Hartford, Conn.-based housing and community economic development nonprofit “working to empower low income people to become self-sufficient community stakeholders.” This organization already owns the web domain for And it’s not the only Co-Opportunity out there.

In Santa Monica, Calif., the community-owned Co-Opportunity food co-op “has been providing natural, organic and local foods to the Santa Monica area since 1974.” This group owns the web domain There is also a Bristol, England-based Co-Opportunity Limited, which is an employee-owned company that offers web design, accounting and database services to clients in England and Wales (which you can find at Co-Opportunity is also the name of a book by John Grant, an author who owns the web domain

While it’s a subjective question, we think most people would tend to agree that Co-Opportunity conjures a more positive image than the stodgy-sounding Center Enterprises. But given the amount of Co-Opportunitys that already exist, was this a smart name change in the age of the Google search? We certainly don’t wish to dump on Center Enterprises/Co-Opportunity, which has a long track record of doing important work, but one imagines that this group’s new website, currently under development, might get lost in the shuffle of all the pre-existing pages one finds online bearing the Co-Opportunity moniker.

According to the Democrat-Herald, Edelson says, “We all agreed it [the new name] worked with what we wanted to say…No one else in the state had it, so we decided that was it.” Is a state-level focus the proper scope to approach such naming decisions with, or has the World Wide Web expanded the breadth of what nonprofits should consider when naming or re-naming their organization? Have you had an experience with renaming your organization? Can you tell NPQ readers about it via one of our “Voices from the Field” columns? –Mike Keefe-Feldman

  • Robert Francis

    Originally the Regional Youth Adult Substance Abuse Program, four years ago we officially changed our name to the Regional Youth Adult Social Action Partnership, keeping our RYASAP acronym which was very well know in the greater Bridgeport CT area where we had our home. We also added a tag line RYASAP: Catalyst for Community Change.

    The problem we have is although the RYASAP name is very well-known in greater Bridgeport, it is not very well known throughout CT where we now have several programs. This is creating a marketing problem for us in an age where everything should be simpler and our name should reflect what we do to a larger audience. My board is very attached to RYASAP and it is unlikely they would be amenable to a change even though it would make terrific sense to have a name more in keeping with who we are.

    Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated!

  • ldekay

    First off, I agree that the new name is more positive sounding, but I also agree that taking a name that is shared by others will only muddy the field on the internet. They may be a locally-focused group but as soon as they have a website (and a new one at that) they’re playing on a much larger field. A quick trip to the Thesaurus gives many alternatives for both “cooperation” and “opportunity”. “Unity Opportunity” struck me as being just as memorable without the naming conflict.

    I’m also not sure the new name ties closely back to the mission of the non-profit group. Seems working off something like “Development Opportunities” would tie-in more closely. Back to the Thesaurus.