logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Addressing the Nonprofit Fear Factor: Advocacy as a Core Competency

Carole Levine
August 17, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
Advocacy by Nick Youngson. CC BY-SA 3.0. Alpha Stock Images.

August 14, 2018; Shepherd Express (Milwaukee, WI)

What is it about advocacy, taking a position on policy issues or lobbying elected officials, even at the local community level, that frightens nonprofits? In Milwaukee, Ashlie Benson and Kyle Hagge, Trinity Fellows at Marquette University, found in a survey of 78 nonprofits they conducted that 60 percent of these organizations did not do any lobbying or any voter registration.

They were not surprised by these results. At a first presentation of their findings to the Milwaukee nonprofit community, Benson and Hagge offered comments and a few options for the nonprofits to address their fears. Evan Casey of the Shepherd Express writes,

“We were anticipating nonprofits facing a lot of potential barriers to lobbying and voter registration,” said Hagge. “We hope they (nonprofits) see that they can be political, it’s just that they cannot be partisan.” The results were also not shocking to Ruth Weill, a community organizer who does work with the Riverwest Business Association.

“Unfortunately, not-for-profits have been under the assumption that they cannot advocate for the folks they work with,” she said. One of the main solutions to this issue proposed by the survey conductors is to participate in the 501 (H) election, an election that nonprofits can take that gives clearer guidelines for a nonprofit’s ability to lobby.

“Besides making things much clearer and definitions more precise, it also grants nonprofits more legal protection, increased capacity to lobby, and, in some cases, simplified record keeping,” said Hagge about the 501 (H) election.

The fear of advocacy among nonprofits and their boards runs deep. And yet, it is the activism of the nonprofit community and its constituencies that made the inroads in securing policies and programs that advanced educational equity, civil and human rights, environmental protections, and other issues. The protections of voting rights and the enrollment of voters has largely rested in the hands of nonprofit organizations, like the League of Women Voters and the ACLU. But many nonprofit boards believe that their tax-exempt status could be jeopardized if they engage in advocacy, lobbying, or voter registration, as Benson and Hagge’s survey affirms.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Now, as we approach the midterm elections, here are some do’s and don’ts for 501c3s around lobbying, advocacy and voter registration, offered up by Frank Martinelli of Shepherd Express based on the resources from Stand for Your Mission, a collaborative project of BoardSource, Bolder Advocacy (part of the Alliance for Justice), the National Council of Nonprofits, the Campion Foundation, United Philanthropy Forum, and the Knight Foundation:

These activities are allowed:

  • Educating the public and decision-makers about your work in a nonpartisan way.
  • Sharing information about how public dollars positively impact your work and your community.
  • Communicating how broader issues impact your mission and the people that you serve.

These activities are allowed as long as nonprofits carry them out in compliance within certain reasonable guidelines:

  • Voter education, registration and candidate forums.
  • Naming legislators who support (or oppose) a specific piece of legislation.
  • Limited lobbying on behalf of the organization.
  • Lobbying and campaigning as private citizens.

These activities are not allowed:

  • Organizational support for (or opposition to) a candidate or set of candidates.
  • Spending federal grant funds on lobbying.

It should be noted that any candidate forum must invite all candidates for that office (even third and fourth parties!), and that any voter guide on a specific piece of legislation must name all legislators and their positions on that issue. This very careful dance is so the nonprofit is not seen as favoring one candidate or party over another. None of this can look like an endorsement. There is a price to be paid for this, even when a nonprofit seems unknowing, as NPQ reported in June 2018.

Board and nonprofit staff leaders need to know their nonprofit status is not in jeopardy when they advocate for policies that will benefit their clients and their work in the community. The myth that advocacy and lobbying are a cause for “mission drift” needs to be addressed, too. When done well, with focus and thought, activities such as these can further align a nonprofit with its mission and goals and bring board and staff together in work that is both personally satisfying and cost-effective for the organization. By taking the opportunity to engage with donors and funders around the kinds of advocacy and lobbying actions that are allowed, we can gain their support in moving issues and programs forward and putting their funds to better use. Lastly, using the organizational mission as the base for advocacy, lobbying, and voter registration can align the organization’s work and keep funders, board, and staff in sync with the organization’s overall goals.

There is a brave new world out there where nonprofits can stand up and stake out their positions in a nonpartisan way and reap the benefits of new partnerships and stronger policies. It can be done without fear of losing nonprofit status, so long as board and staff understand the limits of what can and cannot be done. So, what are you waiting for?—Carole Levine

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Carole Levine

Carole Levine is a principal consultant at Levine Partners, providing consulting services to small and medium-sized nonprofit organizations. She has held senior management positions in four national nonprofits: The National PTA (Deputy Executive Director); Communities in Schools (Vice President of Expansion and Technical Assistance); The Family Resource Coalition (Director of Technical Assistance); and National Lekotek Center (Director of Development). Carole holds a BA in education and political science from Washington University, and an M.Ed. in Early Childhood Leadership and Advocacy from National Louis University. Carole has served on the boards of numerous organizations, holding national positions on the board of National Council of Jewish Women and on the International Council of Jewish Women. She is currently the Chair of Courts Matter Illinois, serves on the board of Chicago Women Take Action and is active on the Promote the Vote Illinois Coalition. Carole is passionate about purposeful work, justice for all, advocacy and her family (which includes 6 amazing grandchildren!).

More about: AdvocacyBoard GovernanceManagement and LeadershipNonprofit News

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Hierarchy and Justice
Cyndi Suarez
Parole Justice Now: Confronting Death by Incarceration in New York
Jonah Walters
Salvadoran Foreign Agent Law Threatens Human Rights Movements
Devon Kearney
Charitable Tax Reform: Why Half Measures Won’t Curb Plutocracy
Alan Davis
Healing-Centered Leadership: A Path to Transformation
Shawn A. Ginwright
Into the Fire: Lessons from Movement Conflicts
Ingrid Benedict, Weyam Ghadbian and Jovida Ross

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Hierarchy and Justice
Cyndi Suarez
Parole Justice Now: Confronting Death by Incarceration in...
Jonah Walters
Salvadoran Foreign Agent Law Threatens Human Rights...
Devon Kearney

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.