logo
  • Nonprofit News
  • Management
    • Boards and Governance
    • Communication
      • Framing & Narratives
    • Ethics
    • Financial Management
    • Grassroots Fundraising Journal
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Philanthropy
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Donor-Advised Funds
    • Foundations
    • Impact Investing
    • Research
    • Workplace Giving
  • Policy
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Housing
    • Government
    • Taxes
  • Economic Justice
    • About
    • Economy Remix
    • Economy Webinars
    • Community Benefits
    • Economic Democracy
    • Environmental Justice
    • Fair Finance
    • Housing Rights
    • Land Justice
    • Poor People’s Rights
    • Tax Fairness
  • Racial Equity
  • Social Movements
    • Community Development
    • Community Organizing
    • Culture Change
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Gender Equality
    • Immigrant Rights
    • Indigenous Rights
    • Labor
    • LGBTQ+
    • Racial Justice
    • Youth Activism
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Featured Articles
  • Webinars
    • Free Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Tiny Spark Podcast
  • Magazine
    • Magazine
    • Leading Edge Membership
Donate
Immigrant Rights, Migration, Policy

API Leaders Call New Immigration Bill “Ethnic Cleansing”

Cyndi Suarez
August 11, 2017
Tweet23
Share4
Share1
Email
Pixabay. Public domain. [CC 0]

August 9, 2017; New America Media and Washington Examiner

The U.S. allows about one million legal immigrants each year. On August 2nd, Senators Tom Cotton (R-AR) and David Perdue (R-GA) unveiled a bill that, if passed, would halve the number of legal immigrants over the next decade, eliminate family reunification and diversity visas, and limit refugees.

“So much for the talking point that immigration hawks are ‘only against illegal immigration,’” wrote Alex Nowrasteh of the conservative Cato Institute.

Though proponents claim the bill would increase “skill-based immigration,” Nowrasteh wrote that “nothing could be further from the truth.” In fact, “the new Cotton-Perdue bill will only increase the proportion of employment-based green cards by cutting other green cards. Saying otherwise is grossly deceptive marketing.”

In February, GOP Senators proposed the RAISE Act (Reforming American immigration for a Strong Economy) with very similar provisions, but the bill stalled in the Senate. It purported to “raise the wages of native-born American workers by reducing the supply of lower-skilled immigrants.” But there is evidence that there is not a direct correlation between limiting immigration and increasing wages. For example, a study of the 1964 cancellation of the Bracero program, a guest worker program that allowed Mexican farmers to work on American farms, found that “the farmers did not adapt to the decline in legal migrants by raising wages. Instead, they mechanized and planted less labor-intensive crops.”

Asian American leaders in San Francisco condemned the new bill this week. They compared it to the plan to challenge affirmative action in higher education announced last week, and see both as part of a white nationalist “ethnic cleansing agenda.”

Dean Ito Taylor, executive director of Asian Pacific Islander Legal Outreach, told New America Media, “It’s almost like they sat around and said, ‘How can we [get rid of] all these Asians and Latinos coming to the country?’”

Readers may remember that in late July, during Trump’s own “Made in America” week, the President not only dismissed criticism of his own companies’ foreign-made goods, his Mar-a-Lago Club and golf course in Florida filed H-2B visas to bring foreign workers for positions they claimed could not be filled by U.S. workers—15 housekeepers, 20 cooks, and 35 servers.—Cyndi Suarez

Tweet23
Share4
Share1
Email

About The Author
Cyndi Suarez

Cyndi Suarez is Co-President and Editor in Chief at NPQ. She is the author of "The Power Manual: How to Master Complex Power Dynamics," in which she outlines a new theory and practice of power. She has worked as a strategy and innovation consultant with a focus on networks and platforms for social movements. She studied Feminist Theory and organizational development for social change.

Related
What’s in the Relief Bill Congress May Pass Today
By Ruth McCambridge
December 17, 2020
Congress Mulls an Increasingly Meager Christmas Coronavirus Relief Bill
By Steve Dubb
December 16, 2020
COVID-19 Commission Must Include Analysis of Structural Racism and Poverty
By Sofia Jarrin
December 8, 2020
The Decriminalization of Drugs Advances Radically in Multiple State Ballot Races
By Ruth McCambridge
November 5, 2020
California Vote Could Alter the Future of the Gig Economy
By Steve Dubb
October 13, 2020
New Jersey Passes Precedent-Setting Environmental Justice Law
By Marian Conway
September 28, 2020

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 21, 2 pm ET

Remaking the Economy

Health, Racial Disparities, and Economic Justice

other posts by The Author
A Cult of Democracy—Toward a Pluralistic Politics
By Cyndi Suarez
January 7, 2021
What Does It Look Like to Support Women of Color to Lead?
By Cyndi Suarez
January 4, 2021
Sheila E.: On Creativity and Voice in Social Change
By Cyndi Suarez
November 10, 2020
CYNDI SUAREZ
The Nonprofit Racial Leadership Gap: Flipping the Lens
Powerful Interests Seek to Make Puerto Rico the Hong Kong of the...
Moving Beyond the Privilege of White Tears
logo
Donate
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletters
  • Write for NPQ
  • Advertise
  • Writers
  • Funders
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy
Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 20-4080038

Subscribe to View Webinars