logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Bad Nonprofit Business Model: Relying on the Support of an Adversary

Larry Kaplan
September 21, 2017
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
Jim Harrington, Texas Civil Rights Project

September 19, 2017; Texas Observer

Two cautionary tales for social justice nonprofits come to mind in this story from the Lone Star State—first, it’s never a good idea to rely predominantly on one donor for most of your organization’s financial support because when that donor goes, so goes your programs. Secondly, if you are going to rock the boat and engage in vitally important social justice advocacy, you are always at risk of losing support from less-than-sympathetic funders. You better have a plan B.

The story comes from the Texas Observer, a nonprofit news organization known for its investigative reporting and coverage of the state’s culture and politics. It tells the tale of the Texas Civil Rights Project (TCRP), a well-known civil rights nonprofit that lost about $900,000 in funding this year—more than 40 percent of its roughly $2 million budget.

TCRP had received significant financial support from the Texas Access to Justice Foundation since its founding in 1990. The Foundation was created by the Texas Supreme Court to distribute state-mandated fees collected from attorneys to support access to the legal system for underserved and disadvantaged populations. But this past July, the foundation—TCRP’s principal benefactor—decided it would no longer support it.

The nonprofit says its funds were revoked for political reasons arising from their work around voting rights and immigration policy. “Let’s be clear about what just happened: Our success at holding the people in power accountable led to the loss of our funding,” said its executive director, Mimi Marziani.

She told the Observer that the nonprofit was already working to reduce its heavy reliance on the foundation’s funding, and so far, the group has raised around a half million new dollars.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

TCRP was founded by civil rights attorney Jim Harrington and has five offices throughout Texas. It has handled more than 2,500 cases for low-income Texans, including suits on behalf of the disabled, victims of police brutality, and undocumented immigrants unable to obtain birth certificates for their children. More recently, TCRP was also one of many plaintiffs to sue the state over the anti-“sanctuary cities” bill in the state legislature earlier this year.

The Texas Access to Justice Foundation distributes millions of dollars each year to about 40 organizations that provide legal services to poor Texans. The foundation, a 501(c)(3), is closely affiliated with the Texas Supreme Court, which launched it in 1984, and its board is appointed by the Supreme Court justices (all Republicans) and the State Bar of Texas.

Even though it has given more money to TCRP than any other group, the foundation cut it all off this year. TCRP called the decision a political “backlash” typical of the Trump era. The foundation says the nonprofit has shifted away from the direct legal services to poor Texans that it exists to fund.

“The Texas Civil Rights Project has made a conscious decision and was in the process of moving out of the direct delivery of legal services,” the foundation told the Observer, specifically citing its “decision to stop helping veterans with foundation funding.”

Harrington, who retired from TCRP in 2015, told the Observer he understood the foundation’s decision, saying that his former organization has strayed from what he called “community-based” cases: “We were very controversial…but everything we were doing was always related to the community. It wasn’t picking up these hot-button liberal issues like redistricting or [the sanctuary cities bill].”

Harrington told the paper that TCRP should have let other organizations handle the lawsuit over the controversial anti-immigrant law. The foundation continues to fund programs that help immigrant crime victims by supporting other legal aid organizations.—Larry Kaplan

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Larry Kaplan

Larry Kaplan is a consultant based in Los Angeles. He describes himself as passionate about urban communities and social justice. He helps non-profit organizations leverage governmental and community relations to advocate for their causes, advance their missions, reach their fundraising goals and achieve their program objectives. He has built and maintained elected officials’ offices, managed political campaigns, helped public agencies increase their effectiveness, and advised private companies and associations on their philanthropic and civic responsibilities.

More about: funder relationshipsManagement and LeadershipNonprofit News

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

NPQ_Winter_2022Subscribe Today
You might also like
Hierarchy and Justice
Cyndi Suarez
Salvadoran Foreign Agent Law Threatens Human Rights Movements
Devon Kearney
Charitable Tax Reform: Why Half Measures Won’t Curb Plutocracy
Alan Davis
Healing-Centered Leadership: A Path to Transformation
Shawn A. Ginwright
Into the Fire: Lessons from Movement Conflicts
Ingrid Benedict, Weyam Ghadbian and Jovida Ross
How Nonprofits Can Truly Advance Change
Hildy Gottlieb

Popular Webinars

Remaking the Economy

Black Food Sovereignty, Community Stories

Register Now

Combating Disinformation and Misinformation in 21st-Century Social Movements

Register Now

Remaking the Economy

Closing the Racial Wealth Gap

Register Now
You might also like
Hierarchy and Justice
Cyndi Suarez
Salvadoran Foreign Agent Law Threatens Human Rights...
Devon Kearney
Charitable Tax Reform: Why Half Measures Won’t Curb...
Alan Davis

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.