logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Nonprofits Defend Department of Education Guidance on Sexual Assault

Lauren Miltenberger
July 21, 2016
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
Sexual-Assault
sexual assault has no excuses / Jason Taellious

July 15, 2016; Inside Higher Ed

A statement recently released by the National Women’s Law Center (NWLC) and signed by more than 80 other groups defends the U.S. Department of Education’s 2011 guidance on how schools must comply with Title IX and work to reduce sexual violence and assaults. This open letter was crafted as a rebuttal to critics who for months have rebuked the Education Department over the guidance, accusing the department’s Office for Civil Rights of overstepping its bounds in relation to rulemaking and violating due process rights of students accused of sexual assault. The NWLC letter dismisses both of these arguments and defends the actions of the Department of Education.

Some advocacy organizations, law professors and legislators claim that the department violated the Administrative Procedure Act by issuing guidance documents without going through a formal notice-and-comment process. They also allege that grievance procedures outlined in the 2011 sexual violence guidance violate due process rights of students accused of sexual assault. Both of these arguments are without merit.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

The issue in relation to rulemaking is whether the 2011 letter issued by the Department of Education (or “Dear Colleague” letter, as it’s commonly known) provides new guidance or new rules. The purpose of the letter, according to the Department of Education, is to provide guidance to help schools become fully compliant with the law and not issue new rules. However, critics including Republican Senators and law professors (including 28 Harvard Law professors) state that the letter does represent new rules and not just guidance, and therefore must follow the process for introducing rules as outlined in the Administrative Procedures Act. (The APA mandates that new federal agency rules must follow a formal process that includes notice and a comment period. Under longstanding practice, federal agencies post new and revised rules and receive and respond to comments via the Federal Register.)

The NWLC letter also commends the Department of Education for its efforts in helping to reduce sexual assaults in schools by enforcing Title IX via guidance documents. Recent sexual violence scandals involving false or discredited charges have spurred schools, colleges, and universities to identify better ways to address this issue.—Lauren Miltenberger

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Lauren Miltenberger

Lauren Miltenberger is an Assistant Professor and the Nonprofit Coordinator for the Department of Public Administration at Villanova University.

More about: colleges and universities education reform sexual assaultEducationNonprofit NewsPolicy

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Finding Power in Community: Lessons from the Chicago Teachers’ Union
Sheri Davis
How Environmental Education Is Moving into High Schools
Ayana Albertini-Fleurant, Dr. Janelle M. Burke, Kari Fulton, Joe Hurst and Ariel Murphy Bedford
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
Why Access to Education Is Key to Dismantling Mass Incarceration
Syrita Steib

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Finding Power in Community: Lessons from the Chicago...
Sheri Davis
How Environmental Education Is Moving into High Schools
Ayana Albertini-Fleurant, Dr. Janelle M. Burke, Kari Fulton, Joe Hurst and Ariel Murphy Bedford
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.