logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

U of Michigan’s President: We Won’t Disclose Students’ Immigration Information

Noreen Ohlrich
February 2, 2017
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

January 28, 2017; Michigan Daily

All across the country, universities have been declaring their support of their students from abroad, and particularly from the seven countries on which Trump last week declared a temporary ban. This past Saturday, University of Michigan president Mark Schlissel released a statement on the U-M website in response to President Donald Trump’s executive order to ban immigrants from seven countries for 90 days. Schlissel said that despite the order, “the university will not release the immigration status information of its students.” He stated that although the university complies with federal requirements regarding its international programs, it “does not share sensitive information like immigration status.” In addition, it is not within the scope of campus police duties to ask questions regarding immigration and citizenship.

The leadership of the university is committed to protecting the rights and opportunities currently available to all members of our academic community, and to do whatever is possible within the law to continue to identify, recruit, support and retain academic talent, at all levels, from around the world… Additionally, we are working to understand the implications on our community of the “extreme vetting” executive order blocking immigration from certain countries.

The Michigan Daily referenced the university’s enrollment summary report. Out of a total of 44,718 students enrolled in 2016, 21,623 came from outside the state, and “as of the Fall 2016 semester, 6,764 students at the university were classified as non-resident alien.” International students who fall under the non-resident alien category typically attend U.S. universities via F-1 or J-1 immigration visas.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Opposition towards Trump’s immigration plan has spread across the campus. More than 1,400 of the university’s staff and students signed a petition last Saturday afternoon “urging Schlissel to ensure protection from deportation to any students under the cover of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals [DACA] Program.” As CNN Money explains, DACA is an executive action put in place by Barack Obama to protect the roughly 750,000 young people brought to the U.S. as children of illegal immigrants. (Back in December, Trump said he would support DACA.)

In his statement, Schlissel notes that in collaboration with the American Association of Universities (AAU) and the Association of Public and Land-grant Universities (APLU), “U-M is among 600 colleges and universities who have signed a letter” supporting DACA. The university is also supporting an act called the Bar Removal of Individuals who Dream and Grow our Economy (BRIDGE) Act. The BRIDGE act is a bipartisan legislation that was reintroduced this month “to provide temporary relief from deportation and work authorization to undocumented youth.” These youths can stay in the U.S. for an additional three years without the threat of deportation.

According to U-M’s office of public affairs, “We will continue to work with higher education institutions and colleagues across the country to support our students and affected community members.” Meanwhile, Fortune reports that Harvard University president Drew Faust has issued a similar statement. The Harvard Crimson reports that at least two Harvard affiliates have been blocked from U.S. entry due to the ban. CBS News reports that the president of the University of Notre Dame, Father John I. Jenkins, has slammed the executive order as “sweeping, indiscriminate and abrupt.” The responses from hundreds of universities include advisories that discourage students and other affiliates from the seven countries affected by the 90-day executive ban from traveling overseas.—Noreen Ohlrich

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Noreen Ohlrich

Noreen is a researcher and educator with over 20 years of experience in the field of human services. She has successfully managed and developed educational projects across sectors. Noreen enjoys living the transnational life with her husband as she analyzes and supports various issues in strategic global philanthropy, as well as social capital and enterprise development.

More about: colleges and universitiesDREAM ActImmigration JusticeNonprofit NewsPresident Donald Trump

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Lessons from Lynn: Leveraging Savings Circles, the “Cuchubal Initiative”
Jeffrey Ashe and Hugo Carvajal
Universities after Neoliberalism: How to Build a Democratic Civic University
Ira Harkavy and Rita A. Hodges
The Discipline of Hope
Cyndi Suarez and Greisa Martínez Rosas
Old University Turns over New Leaf with Launch of Indigenous Studies Chair
A-dae Romero Briones
What It Will Take to Win on Immigration
Greisa Martínez Rosas
Amid COVID, Higher Ed Reconsiders Its Approach to Student Mental Health
Nicole Zerillo

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Lessons from Lynn: Leveraging Savings Circles, the...
Jeffrey Ashe and Hugo Carvajal
AOC’s “Tax the Rich” Dress Dazzles Met Gala, while...
Anastasia Reesa Tomkin
Universities after Neoliberalism: How to Build a Democratic...
Ira Harkavy and Rita A. Hodges

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.