Northwest Area Foundation Takes Stock of $200m Mistake

Print Share on LinkedIn More

February 16, 2011; Source: Star Tribune | Ten years ago, the Northwest Area Foundation took a bold, well-motivated step toward doing what many people have long wanted to see from private foundations – dedicating a huge amount of money to anti-poverty efforts. Two hundred million dollars later, the foundation has concluded that the program was a failure due to a number of problems. According to a report on the experience, the foundation "failed to recognize the flaws in its theory," lacked clear goals, and suffered from a "learn-as-you-go" approach to philanthropy.

The theory was to devote 10 years' worth of grantmaking to anti-poverty efforts, investing $150 million in 10 communities (including Indian tribes) in 8 states plus another $50 million in leadership development and smaller grants for anti-poverty programs. But the key feature was the 10-community long term investment effort.

Each community's efforts started with the foundation's "listening sessions" that eventually led to a strategic plan for the project. But there the initiative stalled out. As Minnesota Council of Nonprofits CEO (and NPQ editorial committee member) Jon Pratt put it: "A whole lot of nothing happened for a long time. I would get calls from people [at nonprofits] asking, 'What's going on?'''

Trying to balance the critique of the foundation program with some examples of positive accomplishments, this Star Tribune article fails to hone in on some of the crucial flaws in the foundation’s theory. The foundation positioned itself as an equal partner with the communities, but the end result was that the foundation was largely in the driver's seat in constructing the strategies.

In most of the communities, the foundation decided to run the funds through entirely new organizations designed and developed for the foundation's program rather than building on the communities' existing nonprofit infrastructure and networks. In the course of the program, the selected communities hardly generated much anti-poverty accomplishment given the amounts of money NWAF invested.

In one case, farm workers in eastern Washington State litigated against the foundation after having been led through the strategic planning process only to be denied the full grant. In another case, urban Indian groups protested against the foundation's program (PDF), leading to compensatory grants of sorts.

What really happened? It seems to be a classic foundation mistake – a foundation that got excited and carried away with an idea and forgot somewhat that these communities aren't laboratories, but real people with histories, cultures, and political (and nonprofit) dynamics.—Rick Cohen

  • Dee Anne Everson

    What a great and brave move on the foundation’s part! It takes courage to admit mistakes and allows for other funders and nonprofits to do the same. The more important question than success or failure is the question was it worth the doing.

  • rick cohen

    Yes, give them credit for being forthright and taking responsibility. Some of the other foundation statements admitting their mistakes are much less straight up, my favorites being the foundations that admit their mistake of having selected a site or group that wasn’t ready for the foundation’s advanced thinking. NWAF deserves credit for the self-critical analysis.

  • Kien Lee

    Yes, no doubt it takes courage for the foundation to admit its mistake. I would assume that that is no different from what the foundation expects from its grantees. The act itself matters less than what the foundation does with the learning and what other foundations learn from their peer’s experience. NWAF has an opportunity to teach its peers not to “learn as they go.” Will it and will other foundations pay attention?