Minnesota Governor Vetoes $1.5M Teach for America Grant

Print Share on LinkedIn More


May 25, 2013; Washington Post

Among the more surprising and shocking headlines of last week was the decision of Minnesota governor Mark Dayton to veto a $1.5 million two-year state grant for Teach for America.

The Minnesota grant wasn’t to pay TFA for a program or contract with TFA for services. It was simply $1.5 million slipped into a higher-education funding bill as an earmark for TFA. However, Crystal Brakke, the executive director of the Twin Cities branch of TFA, explained that every TFA unit is responsible for raising 80 percent of its funding locally and would have used the Minnesota grant to expand its in-state programs. However, no explicit quid-pro-quo for the funding appears to have been contained in the legislation.

Rarely if ever does any public official deny TFA anything. Remember the hornet’s nest of controversy TFA stirred up when it feared it would lose a federal earmark as President Obama first took office? (TFA won the support of the President for its earmark.) A former public school teacher, Dayton questioned why the state of Minnesota would need to add $1.5 million to TFA which, as of 2011, had revenues of $270 million, total expenses of $219 million, and net assets of over $350 million.

But Dayton’s primary concern seemed to be the earmarking itself. As he explained in his line-item veto letter, “My principal concern, however, is the way in which TFA was selected as the recipient of this grant. To my knowledge, no competitive grant program was established; no other applications were solicited; and no objective review was made by an independent panel of experts. Instead, the funds were inserted into the Senate’s Higher Education bill [and] directed to this organization.” Governor Dayton argued that if the state wanted to “encourage programs like TFA,” it should have a formal grant program to which all qualifying programs should apply.

Brakke further explained that 15 other states fund or anticipate funding TFA in a manner like the funding item vetoed in Minnesota. It is simply one of the ways TFA raises money.

In the blowback against Dayton, critics charged that he was opposing TFA because of his allegiance to the teachers unions that supported his past electoral campaign. Last year, the National Education Association named Dayton “America’s Greatest Education Governor.” However, the immediate and virulent reaction against Dayton tied to the unions suggests that many people who support special funding for TFA see it as a bulwark against the unions.

Early last week, the NPQ Newswire mentioned TFA’s New York City fundraiser, at which Kopp made it clear that the next mayor of New York City, whoever it might be, would be hard-pressed not to pursue the education reform agenda of outgoing mayor Michael Bloomberg, a staunch advocate of charter schools and other policies that TFA finds attractive. Despite its massive private sector funding prowess, and although it’s widely considered an icon of private sector social entrepreneurialism, we have long noted that TFA’s entrepreneurial success is quite evident in its ability to raise money from federal government sources, state governments, and local school districts.

Just looking at federal grants and contracts, TFA has continued to do well. For Fiscal Year 2010, for example, the USASpending.gov database shows TFA with several federal grants of significant size. Here are a few:

Selected Federal Government TFA Grants or Contracts in 2010



Nonfederal money

Federal money

Department of Education

Investing in Innovation Scale Up Grants



Department of Education

Fund for the Improvement of Education



Corporation for National and Community Service

AmeriCorps Fixed Amount Grant



Corporation for National and Community Service

AmeriCorps Education Award Program



National Aeronautics and Space Administration




To do so well in federal funding, TFA has spent considerable amounts of money in federal lobbying over the years. The picture of its funding is interesting in that its lobbying expenditures rose considerably in the years of the first term of President Obama. Under President Bush, TFA’s honorary board chair was Laura Bush, which may have assured TFA of a reasonably secure funding picture. During the past four years, particularly as TFA worried about its federal earmark, lobbying rose sharply:

Source: Center for Responsive Politics

The lobbying has obviously paid off. TFA’s federal funding has skyrocketed under an Obama Administration that is purportedly beholden to teacher union funding:

TFA Prime Award Federal Grant/Contracts


# of Federal Grants/Contracts

Federal Grants/Loan Total



$3.4 million



$4.6 million



$7.1 million



$3.5 million



$4.6 million



$8.0 million



$8.7 million



$17.6 million



$24.2 million



$84.0 million



$9.9 million



$25.2 million

Source: Adapted from USASpending.gov

Minnesota Governor Mark Dayton’s action, in an odd way, opens up a discussion about Teach for America. His critics may think that he and other Democrats, like the occupant of the White House, oppose TFA because of their union allegiances, but TFA’s federal funding indicates a different story. Many observers think of TFA as a privately funded bulwark against an obtrusive centralized government apparatus, but it is extensively funded by the centralized government that some of its defenders think it abjures.—Rick Cohen

  • B. Rouson

    Rick makes a powerful case! If only our mainstream media would tell the truth, the whole truth …