Skip to content
Donate Now
  • Donate Now
  • logo
  • logo
  • News
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising
    • Crowdfunding
    • Development
    • Donor Retention
  • Philanthropy
    • Philanthropy
    • Foundations
    • Grantmaking
    • Online Giving
  • Management
    • Management
    • Board Governance
    • Finance
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Policy
    • Policy
    • Activism
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Government
    • Healthcare
    • Taxes
  • Webinars
  • Magazine
  • Opinion
    • Editor’s Notes
    • The Cohen Report
    • Dr. Conflict
    • The Nonprofit Ethicist
    • Unraveling Development
    • Voices from the Field
  • Store
  • Donate Now

  • Subscribe
  • Member Log in
  • Manage Subscription
Link to subscription form
  • News
  • Fundraising
    • Fundraising
    • Crowdfunding
    • Development
    • Donor Retention
  • Philanthropy
    • Philanthropy
    • Foundations
    • Grantmaking
    • Online Giving
  • Management
    • Management
    • Board Governance
    • Finance
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Policy
    • Policy
    • Activism
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Government
    • Healthcare
    • Taxes
  • Webinars
  • Magazine
  • Opinion
    • Editor’s Notes
    • The Cohen Report
    • Dr. Conflict
    • The Nonprofit Ethicist
    • Unraveling Development
    • Voices from the Field
  • Store
  • My Menu

The “War of Positions” between Funders, Nonprofits, and Community

By Ruth McCambridge Ruth McCambridge | May 3, 2017
Share74
Share34
Tweet4
Email
Shares 112

By August von Heyden, died 19th cent., Public Domain, Link

May 2, 2017; Urban Milwaukee

NPQ has written quite often over the years about how power differentials between community, nonprofits and funders can often play out to the detriment of community interests and real social change. The dance that is performed, for instance, in turning a set of community interests into “foundation-speak” is essentially a worldview translation that changes all frames of reference in favor of those controlling the money. Despite being portrayed as such, this is not a new notion; we heard it 30 years ago from staff at the Seventh Generation Fund. But it appears we have not taken it seriously enough, because every time it comes up, it’s treated as a surprising analysis…before being dropped and then forgotten.

The Helen Bader Institute for Nonprofit Management recently presented a forum featuring Erica Kohl-Arenas, a professor at the New School with a background in popular education who authored The Self-Help Myth: How Philanthropy Fails to Alleviate Poverty. Kohl-Arenas challenged the room full of nonprofit executives to consider how their funding affects the substance of their work. She based that challenge on research she did on three initiatives in California’s Central Valley, including the Cesar Chavez-led farmworker movement.

Kohl-Arenas identified what she called “a war of position” between the different interests—including funders, nonprofits and the farmworkers themselves—involved in these movements. She said stakeholders in social change movements engage in “[multiple] layers of decision-making and agenda-setting.” These negotiations necessitate building consensus and often end up compromising the goals of those most affected by structural inequalities. According to Kohl-Arenas, “Institutions made of industrial wealth are not going to continue to support a movement that challenges industrial wealth.”

“Usually,” Kohl-Arenas added, “what ends up happening is that space in the middle leaves out the harder structural changes and root causes that the more powerful players in this war of position don’t want to address. Real wisdom comes when people engage in discussions, and analysis and research about their own lives, and build community-based strategies for change in partnership with stakeholders and organizations.”

You can view her analysis of how foundations and nonprofits engage in “the negotiation of popular myths” as underwriting theories of change around fundable work—too often, to the detriment of social change and community self-determination—below.

Patrick Schrank, director of programs at Milwaukee Christian Center, who also attended the Bader presentation, agrees, saying that nonprofits must “center” the conversation on—and include the voices of—those being served.

“It’s really challenging to keep the infrastructure in place [and] keep the funding in place to do the work. And, that can, sometimes…dominate the conversation,” said Schrank.—Ruth McCambridge

Share74
Share34
Tweet4
Email
Shares 112

About Ruth McCambridge

Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor in Chief of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

  • More by Ruth

Read Next

  • Founder Turmoil at the Conservative Nonprofit Eagle Forum: Who’s in Charge Here?

    In a classic case of nonprofit founder-syndrome, 91-year-old conservative powerhouse Phyllis Schlafly is being ejected from the Eagle Forum—but not without considerable resistance.

Popular Posts

  1. A Graphic Re-visioning of Nonprofit Overhead
  2. You First: Leadership for a New World—“Three Tests of Leadership”
  3. The University Elephant in the Room: Where’s Community Engagement Headed?
  4. Problem Boards or Board Problem?
  5. Glassdoor Ratings and the Nonprofit Workplace
  6. Racism, Not Race, Causes Health Disparities for Black Mothers

Write for NPQ

  • Our Mission
  • Advertise
  • Board of Directors
  • Foundations and Funders
  • Editorial Advisory Board
  • NPQ Staff
  • Contact Us
  • Press Release
  • Donors
  • Newsletters
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy

  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy

Back to top ↑

To Access the Full Article, Please Login or Subscribe

Can't Login?

Register a New Account Forgot Password

Continue Reading
112 Shares
Share74
Share34
Tweet4
Email