March 12, 2015; Capital Public Radio
NPQ has previously covered some of the new items that libraries are lately lending to their patrons—beyond books, CDs, and DVDs. We have covered libraries that provide a seed exchange and that rent sewing machines, but the Sacramento library is launching a full-on library of things, which kicked off on Saturday, that is firmly based in a community assessment. Among other things, it will rent prom dresses and board games and a wide range of musical instruments. They have also created for use at the library of things a bike repair station and a 3-D scanner, but they rejected the idea of an actual automobile for library loan on the grounds that it would be too expensive.
Sign up for our free newsletters
Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
“There’s a movement towards a lot of innovation and experimentation in libraries,” says Ken Haycock, a longtime library and information science educator with the University of Southern California. “I think the issue is—how can we have more experiments and innovations that are still true to the mission of libraries? And that’s what you’re seeing in Sacramento,” said Haycock. “It needs to be girded in a distinct community need and a very strong assessment in terms of the benefit of a return on investment for community tax dollars.”
The library of things is not in the least a response to lower use of libraries; as in other localities, library use is up, says Rivkah Sass, who is the library director at the Sacramento Public Library. She says that traditional book checkouts are up by about three percent. The Library of Things simply builds from that strong base organically.
The idea of a library of things has popped up all over, in and outside of libraries—in Slovenia, in Berlin and Amsterdam, and London, and elsewhere.
These kinds of projects could certainly be thought of as part of a sharing economy, and there is a lovely essence of common sense about them. Who really wants to own their own Bundt pan?—Ruth McCambridge