logo
  • Nonprofit News
  • Management
    • Boards and Governance
    • Communication
      • Framing & Narratives
    • Ethics
    • Financial Management
    • Grassroots Fundraising Journal
    • Leadership
    • Technology
  • Philanthropy
    • Corporate Social Responsibility
    • Donor-Advised Funds
    • Foundations
    • Impact Investing
    • Research
    • Workplace Giving
  • Policy
    • Education
    • Healthcare
    • Housing
    • Government
    • Taxes
  • Economic Justice
    • About
    • Economy Remix
    • Economy Webinars
    • Community Benefits
    • Economic Democracy
    • Environmental Justice
    • Fair Finance
    • Housing Rights
    • Land Justice
    • Poor People’s Rights
    • Tax Fairness
  • Racial Equity
  • Social Movements
    • Community Development
    • Community Organizing
    • Culture Change
    • Education
    • Environment
    • Gender Equality
    • Immigrant Rights
    • Indigenous Rights
    • Labor
    • LGBTQ+
    • Racial Justice
    • Youth Activism
  • About Us
  • Log in
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Featured Articles
  • Webinars
    • Free Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Tiny Spark Podcast
  • Magazine
    • Magazine
    • Leading Edge Membership
Donate
Combatting Stereotypes

Amsterdam Museum Walks Fine Line by Altering Offensive Art Titles

Aine Creedon
December 17, 2015
Share7
Share4
Email
Tweet
Rijksmuseum
Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam / erich2448

December 15, 2015; The Daily Beast

A new “Adjustment of Colonial Terminology” program at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam seeks to remove outdated racist terminology from its artwork titles to avoid offending museum-goers. Terms associated with racial stereotypes such as “Indian,” “negro,” “dwarf,” and “Mohammedan’’ (a term once associated with Muslims) are being replaced by more politically correct words. The Rijksmuseum has already altered more than 200 names. For example, a 1900 painting originally titled “Young Negro-Girl” has been renamed “Young Girl Holding a Fan.”

Although these original titles will still remain on labels, some art historians are critical of the changes, calling it censorship. Martine Gosselink, head of the Department of History at the Rijksmuseum, who initiated the project, explains that instead of rewriting history, “The point is not to use names given by whites to others.” Artworks were generally not named until the late 18th century and were usually named by exhibition curators, not the artists who created the art.

Initiatives to refrain from racially insensitive terminology are commendable (NFL Washington franchise owner Dan Snyder clearly hasn’t gotten the memo), but they also raise numerous other questions. Should the same standard now extend to literature and other forms of art and history? Where do we draw the line, and are we then omitting historical context? While it’s important not to erase our history, we also need to acknowledge and move away from sensitive terminology that could be perceived as racially offensive to members of our various communities. Could the Rijksmuseum set a new precedent for political correctness in museum institutions? — Aine Creedon

Share7
Share4
Email
Tweet

About The Author
Aine Creedon

Aine Creedon is Nonprofit Quarterly's Digital Publishing Coordinator and has worn many hats at NPQ over the past five years. She has extensive experience with social media, communications and outreach in the nonprofit sector, and spent two years in Americorps programs serving with a handful of organizations across the nation. Aine currently resides in Denver, Colorado where she enjoys hiking with her pups Frida and Tucker. She enjoys volunteering in her free time and also serves on the advisory board for the Young Nonprofit Professionals Network Denver and is the Marketing Liaison for YNPN Denver's Professional Development Committee.

Related
Survey Finds Vast Shortfall in Diversity Efforts of Leading Boston Nonprofits
By Steve Dubb
December 1, 2020
Following National Trend, Boston Art Museum Workers 9–1 Vote in Favor of Union
By Steve Dubb
November 24, 2020
Museums Forced to Close Again as Survey Documents Harm to Date
By Ruth McCambridge
November 18, 2020
No Touching, Just Reaching Out: Cultural Nonprofits amid COVID-19
By Nicole Zerillo
November 13, 2020
The Vanishing Voter: How Did Low Turnout US Elections Become the Norm?
By Steve Dubb
November 10, 2020
Baltimore Museum of Art Pulls Back Art from Auction Hours before the Event
By Ruth McCambridge
October 30, 2020

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 21, 2 pm ET

Remaking the Economy

Health, Racial Disparities, and Economic Justice

other posts by The Author
NPQ’s Reader Favorites of 2019
By Aine Creedon and Jason Schneiderman
December 24, 2019
MoveOn’s Social Media Experiment: Can Facebook Ads...
By Aine Creedon
November 7, 2018
How Nonprofits Can Keep AdWords Grants following Major...
By Aine Creedon
May 7, 2018
CYNDI SUAREZ
The Nonprofit Racial Leadership Gap: Flipping the Lens
Powerful Interests Seek to Make Puerto Rico the Hong Kong of the...
Moving Beyond the Privilege of White Tears
logo
Donate
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletters
  • Write for NPQ
  • Advertise
  • Writers
  • Funders
  • Copyright Policy
  • Privacy Policy
Registered 501(c)(3). EIN: 20-4080038

Subscribe to View Webinars