logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Armed Guards Exclude “Former” Board Members from Board Meeting

Ruth McCambridge
March 5, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

March 4, 2019; Buffalo News

In a bizarre turn of events, the Community Action Organization of Western New York, an anti-poverty agency founded in 1965, stationed three armed security guards at its board meeting yesterday to keep out the public its board is specifically designed to represent. This is the same organization that we wrote about two weeks ago, where the board’s attorney had taken it upon himself to dismiss four board members after reinstating the CEO who had been fired by the board. Both the CEO and the attorney are said to be longtime associates of Buffalo’s current mayor.

The four board members, who had been “dismissed” for technical reasons on letterhead from the attorney’s law firm rather than the CAO board, were turned away at the door, where a sign indicating that this was a “private meeting” was posted. One had to be “on the list,” they were told.

The board members were there to demand reinstatement. They had already been replaced, and other vacant positions filled, reportedly by “newly appointed board members connected to the mayor.”

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

“They are evading federal law,” said Jenine Dunn, the former board president. Also excluded were Jennifer Shank, Doris Cummings-Ford, and Melissa R.H. Brown.

Community action agency boards are required to have broad community representation on their boards, but they also often have members appointed by local government. This and other factors make them, in some locations, highly political entities, though that element of their identities has faded over the years. The Buffalo News reports that:

While CAO states on its website that the public is invited to attend its meetings, it is not a government entity subject to the Open Meetings Law. In an advisory opinion issued two decades ago, New York’s Committee on Open Government said anti-poverty agencies like the CAO, created by federal legislation in 1964, should keep the public informed and comply with reasonable requests for financial information. But the advisory opinion does not say such agencies must open their meetings.

The excluded board members now have their own attorney.—Ruth McCambridge

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: Board ChairsBoard GovernanceNonprofit NewsScandals

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Are Your Organization and Its Board “Access Able”?
Katherine Schneider
Navigating Succession: Four Exiting CEO Mindsets
Aparna Anand Joshi, Donald C. Hambrick and Jiyeon Kang
Survey Finds Vast Shortfall in Diversity Efforts of Leading Boston Nonprofits
Steve Dubb
Network Governance as an Empowerment Tool
Blythe Butler and Sami Berger
Perfectly Legal: Trump’s Taxes and the Corruption of the US Ruling Class
Steve Dubb
Otto Bremer’s 3 Paid Trustees Face State Charges of Violating Their Trustee Role
Marian Conway

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
AOC’s “Tax the Rich” Dress Dazzles Met Gala, while...
Anastasia Reesa Tomkin
Foundation Giving Numbers for 2020 Show 15 Percent Increase
Steve Dubb
Strike MoMA Imagines Art Museums without Billionaires
Tessa Crisman

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.