logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Dialing for Dollars

Timothy Lyster
December 6, 2010
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

December 5, 2010; Source: The Star Press | Whatever opinion you hold about them, telephone marketers exist because they successfully sell things to people—whether they are Ginsu knives, magazine subscriptions, or a nonprofit mission. In the latter case, however, the practice of outsourcing fundraising to a call center has come under increasing scrutiny, particularly concerning how donations are split between the organization and the telemarketer.

In Indiana, the State Fraternal Order of Police (FOP) finds itself the subject of newspaper coverage about its fundraising practices. Having dumped two consultants that were permanently prohibited from telemarketing by the Federal Trade Commission—the pair raised $2.7 million for FOP and kept $2.4 million as fees—the Star Press reports that FOP hired Group Consultants Inc., a company run by a John Keller, who also has a “questionable track record.”

Keller himself paid the FTC $300,000 for violating the agency’s Telemarketing Sales Rule. And the Indiana Troopers Association is fighting Keller in US Bankruptcy Court, alleging “fraud, unethical practices, theft, deception, racketeering.”

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Keller’s company works with several charities that seem to be little more than sham operations that pay top staff large salaries and give Keller large sums in fundraising fees. One of his clients, the “Children’s Charity Fund in Sarasota, Fla., gets an “exceptionally poor” rating from Charity Navigator because “87 percent of its expenses go for fundraising, 7 percent for administration and only 6 percent on programs for which the charity was created.”

To top it all, Keller’s phone solicitors are still using scripts written by the prior discredited consultants, which appear to be deliberately opaque when questioned on how much of a donation the charity actually receives.

None of this may rise to the level that triggers an investigation, and FOP’s president is reportedly unconcerned. But we have to wonder, couldn’t FOP have chosen someone with less baggage? Remember, if your organization hires a telemarketer, that firm is representing your nonprofit, and is therefore an extension of your brand. If they have questionable practices, then, in the public’s eyes, so will you.—Timothy Lyster

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

NPQ_Winter_2022Subscribe Today
You might also like
Remaking the Economy: Caring for the Care Economy
Steve Dubb, Adria Powell and Jenn Stowe
Race, Class, and Climate: Organizing for a Better Future in Pueblo, Colorado
Jamie Valdez
Faith as a Pathway to Climate Action
Anmol Irfan
Countering Authoritarianism: Forging a Progressive Response to Fragmentation
john a. powell and Sara Grossman
America’s Broken Safety Net—and How to Address It: An Interview with Alissa Quart
Steve Dubb and Alissa Quart
New York Brings Power to the People
Johanna Bozuwa

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
AOC’s “Tax the Rich” Dress Dazzles Met Gala, while...
Anastasia Reesa Tomkin
Foundation Giving Numbers for 2020 Show 15 Percent Increase
Steve Dubb
Strike MoMA Imagines Art Museums without Billionaires
Tessa Crisman

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.