logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

Faith and Action: The Political Efficacy Recipe

Chelsea Dennis
January 4, 2019

December 27, 2018; Pine Bluff Commercial

Partnerships between community-based nonprofits and religious institutions are common. NPQ has highlighted numerous instances when churches have stepped in to solve social issues in their communities, including providing disaster relief during Hurricane Florence, addressing the affordable housing crisis by leasing land for development, and even establishing social enterprises to combat food insecurity. Now, researchers are trying to determine whether lessons from the pulpit encourage community engagement and political efficacy.

Led by Dr. Rebecca Glazier, the Little Rock Congregations Study builds off a smaller study conducted in 2012 among five churches with a total of 274 respondents. Researchers found that levels of political efficacy (belief that one’s actions can make a difference) were higher for congregants that attended churches in which sermons focused on helping the community. The most recent study quintuples the number of survey respondents (1,474) and diversifies the type of congregations surveyed including Unitarian Universalists, Protestant, Catholic, Mormon, Muslim, and Jewish places of worship. Similar to the earlier study, researchers found that respondents who reported hearing more community-focused sermons were more likely to be actively involved in the community and had better political efficacy. For example, the most common political activities reported by participants were persuading someone else to vote, signing petitions, and sharing information on social media. Additionally, places of worship that were more engaged in the community had more engaged congregants.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

According to Glazier, while partnerships between churches and nonprofits are commonly thought to occur because of a need to share resources or as a cost-reduction strategy, churches primarily partner out of a desire to engage with the broader community. For instance, women who attend Westover Hills Presbyterian Church volunteer as literacy instructors at the Pulaski County Regional Detention Facility. Through the program, the church has reached more than 450 students. The ability to connect with the larger community as a practice of faith benefits religious institutions in more ways than one—providing the opportunity to help those in need, bring people into the faith, and foster stronger relationships between congregants through volunteerism.

Researchers offer three recommendations for congregations looking to become more engaged.

  • Find a Cause. Determine what issues matter most to your congregation either by conducting a survey, holding a speaker series or an organization fair to learn more about the work being done in the community.
  • Talk More about Community Engagement. The research has shown congregants are more likely to be engaged in the community if they hear messages about it. Clergy are encouraged to speak more about volunteering, local and national issues, and on the importance of being involved in the community. More importantly, leadership should model the behavior it hopes to see.
  • Partner with Others. For places of worship concerned about capacity, partnering with others to increase impact is a viable solution. For instance, Mark’s Episcopal Church houses a fully volunteer-led food pantry. Partnering with five other churches, the pantry was able to serve 10,699 people in 2017.

Partnerships play an important role in delivering services to the community. The study uncovered that more than 50 percent of the churches with food banks partner with other organizations to offer such services. Similarly, 60 percent of congregations that provide healthcare services partner with others as well. Researchers attribute the need to collaborate due to the significant amount of resources needed to provide food and health services. For instance, Esperanza Hope Neighborhood Health Clinic, another participating congregation in the research study, partners with a local hospital which provides free imaging services like ultrasounds, X-rays, and MRI services.

During the spring of 2019, Glazier’s team will focus their research on the relationships nonprofit organizations have with places of worship to better understand their perspectives. Additionally, with the support from the Arkansas Community Foundation, the team intends to present its findings to clergy members and recruit members for a clergy advisory board which will assist in executing the 2020 Little Rock Congregation Study. Glazier hopes to increase the number of participants in the upcoming survey by expanding outside the Little Rock area particularly in rural communities. The research indicated that many congregants prioritized community involvement and Glazier hopes that more interfaith work will come of their research.—Chelsea Dennis

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
About the author
Chelsea Dennis

Chelsea has made it her life's mission to serve communities in need and create greater change. As a Programs Assistant at the Elks National Foundation, Chelsea manages a $5.5 million portfolio of more than 2,000 small community grants. Prior to joining the ENF, Chelsea served as an AmeriCorps member for two years. The first year she served with City Year Washington DC where she provided mentorship, tutoring, and social-emotional skill building to elementary students. After her first term, she relocated to Chicago and served at Albany Park Community Center, where she supported immigrants in obtaining the English skills necessary to pursue their personal goals.

More about: Nonprofit NewsPartnershipsReligious / Faith-BasedSocial Movements
See comments

Call to action
You might also like
Organizers at Global Teach-ins Seek Solutions and Envision What Comes Next
April Doner and Deissy Perilla
Are There Too Many Nonprofits? Or Too Few Bridges Between Them?
Kate Harris
We The Action: A Free Legal Aid Network for Nonprofits
Isaiah Thompson
What Is Collective Narrative Infrastructure and Why Does It Matter?
Emi Aguilar and Trevor Smith
Philanthropy Should Support Frontline Leadership in Times of Crisis
Rhett Ayers Butler
At “No Kings” Rally During Government Shutdown, Federal Workers Speak Out
Steve Dubb

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, " Isaiah Thompson: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025: Isaiah Thompson
Isaiah Thompson
Staff Picks for 2025: Steve Dubb
Steve Dubb
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, "Alison Stine: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025: Alison Stine
Alison Stine

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.