A dear colleague of mine informed me the other day that her relatively small community-based organization has won an award for more than a million dollars to be spent over the next two years to bring their programs “to scale.” Wow!
Hers is an excellent organization full of careful, thoughtful women — this includes board, staff, and constituents alike. However I have to admit that my first reaction to her glad announcement was one of alarm. After years in this work I have gotten used to the scary specter of hollowed-out nonprofit organizations that were pushed beyond their capacity or outside the bounds of their mission by a super-sized contribution. Many of them continue to this day to walk the earth as the undead among us.
Now, it is certainly not a foregone conclusion that bad things come from big donations but the syndrome in all of its variations is common enough to warrant a closer look.
Sign up for our free newsletters
Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
The attached article by Clara Miller is entitled “Gift Horse or Trojan Horse?”
http://www.dev-npq-site.pantheonsite.io/section/515.html and it does a wonderful job of cautioning us against some of the more common traps embedded in large gifts. It promises to be a classic in the financial management/fundraising genre, and is a must-read for board members, fundraisers, managers and funders.
We have also included links to two of Clara’s previous articles in the Nonprofit Quarterly. Together, these provide a powerful look at how capital structure affects organizational function and flexibility.
Meanwhile, my friend with the million-dollar grant has been around the block a few times. Her planning systems are broadly inclusive of the community she serves, her negotiating skills are honed and sharp and her ability to redirect headstrong funders is legendary. I shouldn’t worry but… I’m sending her Clara’s article anyway.