logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Heads Up! Even Nonprofits without Millionaire Execs Should Know Excise Tax Changes

Ruth McCambridge
April 25, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
Guy Empey Productions / Pioneer Film Corporation [Public domain], via Wikimedia Commons

April 24, 2019; Lexology

A Lexology article cautions nonprofits paying far less than $1 million to their CEOs that there are circumstances under which the new salary excise tax included in the 2017 federal tax law will affect them. Their piece breaks down the nonprofit-specific provisions to the tax code in terms of how they may come into play for organizations that may not be expecting it.

Much of what Venable LLP has to say in this piece comes from IRS guidance provided in Notice 2019-9. Among other things, they caution that “even if a nonprofit organization does not pay any of its employees annual remuneration in excess of $1 million, the organization could be subject to the excise tax if it has a deferred compensation plan in which benefits are spread out over a period of years, and then vest all at once.”

For example, a nonprofit organization that pays its chief executive officer an annual salary of $700,000 per year and contributes $50,000 per year to a deferred compensation plan that vests after 10 years could be liable for a tax of $42,000 in the year of vesting (21 percent of the excess of $1.2 million (salary of $700,000 + vested deferred compensation of $500,000) over $1 million, or $200,000). Thus, even though the nonprofit organization never paid its chief executive a salary of more than $700,000, it incurred liability for the excise tax when the chief executive’s deferred compensation vested. Importantly, Code Section 4960 does not provide a “grandfather” rule that would exempt remuneration paid under a deferred compensation plan that was entered into prior to the enactment of Code Section 4960.

(Most of us only wish we had such problems, or don’t but wonder what the salary ratios in those organizations look like overall—but, moving on…)

These provisions also apply to “excess parachute payments,” which refers to a severance that amounts to more than three times an employee’s average salary over the last five years.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Those considered to be “covered employees” include any nonprofit’s five highest-compensated employees for the current taxable year, with no minimum threshold.

Some additional guidance from the IRS notice referenced earlier:

  • Each employer within a related group of tax-exempt organizations will need to make its own separate determination of who is a covered employee in every year (even in years when the employer is not subject to the excise tax).
  • Once an individual is classified as a covered employee, the individual remains a covered employee indefinitely, even if the individual is no longer one of the employer’s five highest-compensated employees.
  • In identifying its five-highest compensated employees, an employer must include remuneration paid to the employee by any “related” organizations.

So, long story short, while many organizations are too small to feel the effects of this provision, under some circumstances even more modest ones may have to crunch some numbers to ensure the entities paying the bill are covered.

In sum, in addition to nonprofit organizations that pay remuneration in excess of $1 million, Code Section 4960 can potentially affect many other nonprofit organizations, including those organizations that use deferred compensation plans to attract and retain executives, and those that pay severance packages to departing employees. Furthermore, the $1 million threshold is not adjusted for inflation, so over time it will encompass an ever-increasing number of nonprofit organizations. In addition, the requirement to track covered employees indefinitely introduces new record keeping requirements for many nonprofit organizations.

Again, for most of us this advice will be immaterial, but the change in regulation is worth noting.—Ruth McCambridge

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: executive compensationManagement and LeadershipNonprofit News

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Hierarchy and Justice
Cyndi Suarez
Salvadoran Foreign Agent Law Threatens Human Rights Movements
Devon Kearney
Charitable Tax Reform: Why Half Measures Won’t Curb Plutocracy
Alan Davis
Healing-Centered Leadership: A Path to Transformation
Shawn A. Ginwright
Into the Fire: Lessons from Movement Conflicts
Ingrid Benedict, Weyam Ghadbian and Jovida Ross
How Nonprofits Can Truly Advance Change
Hildy Gottlieb

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Hierarchy and Justice
Cyndi Suarez
Salvadoran Foreign Agent Law Threatens Human Rights...
Devon Kearney
Charitable Tax Reform: Why Half Measures Won’t Curb...
Alan Davis

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.