logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

In Georgia, Prospects for Hospital Transparency Remain Cloudy

Steve Dubb
January 7, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

 January 4, 2019; Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Writing in the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Carrie Teegardin questions CEO compensation levels at nonprofit hospitals and whether those hospitals provide adequate community benefits. But the Georgia story has an interesting twist, in that many of its “nonprofit hospitals” are actually public hospitals that nonprofits manage. As Teegardin explains:

For years, many Georgia hospitals were run by their county hospital authority. The hospitals were built primarily with public money and managed by each authority’s board of political appointees. But as healthcare became more complex, many authorities needed more flexibility.

So, a generation ago, one public authority after another created nonprofit organizations to run their hospitals under long-term lease agreements. These days, patients often have no idea that their local hospital has public roots, but many do.

The WellStar Health System operates public hospitals in several counties, including its Kennestone facility in Cobb. Gwinnett Medical Center is owned by the public but operated by a nonprofit. In 1991, the Hospital Authority of Fulton County followed the trend and created the nonprofit Northside Hospital Inc. to lease the public hospital and carry out the authority’s mission.

This dual status is not unique to Georgia, but its implementation has raised questions about what rights the public retains when a county hospital is managed by a nonprofit. These questions have hit the courts, the press, and the state legislature.

As Teegardin explains, in Georgia, public authorities are subject to open records laws. But hospital managers have suggested their nonprofit status exempts them from these laws. Georgia courts have disagreed, ruling that they are still “carrying out the business of government.”

Legal precedent notwithstanding, Northside Hospital in Fulton County, Georgia (county seat: Atlanta) has dragged its feet. Northside argues that releasing records would give competitors an unfair edge. In 2013, a lawyer sued Northside for its refusal to hand over documents on some business transactions, leading to a court battle that now has extended into 2019.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Teegardin notes that Northside achieved some victories in lower courts, but the Georgia Supreme Court vacated those rulings and remanded the case back to Fulton County Superior Court to determine whether the specific documents being requested—involving Northside’s $100 million acquisition of large physician groups—had to be released.

Meanwhile, the legal battle has woken up the state legislature, which now threatens to get into the act. Teegardin notes that, “A report last month by 26 House members calls for legislation that would mandate charity care levels for nonprofit hospitals and require the hospitals to disclose the value of their tax exemptions…the report also calls for nonprofits to post executive salaries on hospital websites and would make ‘all operating subsidiaries of hospital authority-owned hospitals…subject to open records requirements.’”

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution itself has jumped in. Teegardin notes that, “While nonprofits must report their total compensation in their public IRS forms eventually, the AJC has repeatedly sought more detailed information. Without it, it’s impossible to know if hospitals reward the CEOs who oversee public hospitals solely on financial performance and growth, or whether quality and community service are also rewarded.”

Some nonprofit-managed public hospitals do share records. Teegardin writes that, “When the AJC asked Grady Memorial for its CEO’s contract and information about its bonus program, the hospital readily agreed, and Grady CEO John Haupert sat down with the AJC to discuss the plan. The WellStar Health System also provided the AJC with its CEO’s compensation documents. They show a detailed plan that uses measurements of employee trust and engagement, patient satisfaction and clinical quality. Financial measures made up just 20 percent of the bonus plan.”

The Georgia hospital world faces multiple trends. According to Ethan James of the Georgia Hospital Association, six rural Georgia hospitals and two state psychiatric facilities have closed since 2011, two others have closed emergency departments, and many have discontinued labor and delivery services. Yet other hospitals prosper. Northside, for instance, had $327 million in net revenues in 2017, up from $41 million in 2010, with an overall margin of 17.9 percent; some Georgia hospitals enjoy revenue margins as high as 30 percent. In essence, rural hospitals are struggling, while many suburban hospitals prosper.

Then, there is uncompensated, or so-called “charity care.” Teegardin reports that Northside Atlanta did seven percent and others less than five percent. WellStar hospitals range from 13 to 18 percent, while at Grady, long the “safety net” hospital for Atlanta, three in ten patients were served without being billed.

Interestingly, Grady is a bit of a rebel. Grady was late to the nonprofit model, setting up its nonprofit in 2008 only when compelled to raise donations to stave off bankruptcy. Grady’s lease states clearly that the nonprofit is subject to open meeting requests.

Pete Correll, former CEO of Georgia-Pacific and a person whom Teegardin labels “dean of Atlanta’s business community,” was the first chairman of Grady’s nonprofit board. Correll says he agrees the state should push nonprofit hospitals to serve more poor patients—rather than, say, redirect their indigent patients to Grady. “They need to say there is some minimal level of charity care that you must do to qualify for being a not-for-profit,” Correll tells Teegardin.—Steve Dubb

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Steve Dubb

Steve Dubb is senior editor of economic justice at NPQ, where he writes articles (including NPQ’s Economy Remix column), moderates Remaking the Economy webinars, and works to cultivate voices from the field and help them reach a broader audience. Prior to coming to NPQ in 2017, Steve worked with cooperatives and nonprofits for over two decades, including twelve years at The Democracy Collaborative and three years as executive director of NASCO (North American Students of Cooperation). In his work, Steve has authored, co-authored, and edited numerous reports; participated in and facilitated learning cohorts; designed community building strategies; and helped build the field of community wealth building. Steve is the lead author of Building Wealth: The Asset-Based Approach to Solving Social and Economic Problems (Aspen 2005) and coauthor (with Rita Hodges) of The Road Half Traveled: University Engagement at a Crossroads, published by MSU Press in 2012. In 2016, Steve curated and authored Conversations on Community Wealth Building, a collection of interviews of community builders that Steve had conducted over the previous decade.

More about: Community benefit agreementsHealthcareManagement and LeadershipNonprofit News

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Writing New Narratives for Health
Sonia Sarkar
Decolonizing Healthcare Education and Practice
Sonia Sarkar
The Business of Appropriating Ancient Healing Practices
Sonia Sarkar
Hierarchy and Justice
Cyndi Suarez
Dreaming and Designing Healing Systems
Sonia Sarkar
How Anti-Protest Laws Protect Violent Vigilantes—And Why We Must Fight Back
Angela Weiland

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
High contrast image of a Black woman whose face is segmented into thin slices which are floating in front in her head. Between the slices are flowers growing. She is looking towards a collage of three suns on an orange background.
Writing New Narratives for Health
Sonia Sarkar
Decolonizing Healthcare Education and Practice
Sonia Sarkar
The Business of Appropriating Ancient Healing Practices
Sonia Sarkar

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.