logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

More than Roe Is at Stake in Upcoming US Supreme Court Ruling

Carole Levine
February 5, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
Credit: Jordan Uhl.

February 4, 2019; Colorlines and Vox

Women’s access to reproductive health care, including abortion, this week has again become a key domino in the game to be played out at the US Supreme Court. Unfortunately, the health and well-being of women in Louisiana and other states hang in the balance, as does the rule of law and how precedents are applied in our judicial system.

This case isn’t new, nor is the strategy of chipping away at the ability of reproductive health clinics to provide abortion services to clients. In fact, the issue it brings to the fore—the mandate that doctors at abortion clinics have admitting privileges at hospitals within 30 miles of their clinics—may cause déjà vu. What’s wrong with this picture? Well, the Supreme Court already ruled on this issue in a Texas case, Whole Women’s Health v. Hellerstedt. In a 5-to-3 decision in 2016, the Court ruled that this same “admitting privilege,” along with a requirement that these clinics meet the same standards as surgery centers, placed an undue burden on women seeking reproductive care and abortions.

So, the question being raised again before the Court is one of precedent—has this not already been decided? Is an undue burden different in Texas than Louisiana? Are lower federal courts disregarding Supreme Court decisions? All of this is at play this week when the Court considers how it will rule.

A decision should be issued swiftly after the hearing, which is scheduled for February 7, 2019. This will not be a full-blown hearing; this is a motion for an emergency stay of the Louisiana law, which would either stop it from taking effect or uphold it. The full Court will weigh in on the issue, however, and much is at stake for those on both sides of the abortion issue and for the Supreme Court itself. Writing for Slate, Mark Joseph Stern reports:

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

The consequences of a 5–4 decision permitting Act 620 to take effect would extend far beyond one state. It would indicate that the Supreme Court’s new majority has retreated from Whole Woman’s Health, signaling that states are free to ignore it and pass stringent laws targeting abortion clinics. Once Whole Woman’s Health is functionally overturned, Roe itself will be next on the chopping block. After all, Whole Woman’s Health really just reaffirmed the fundamental principle that states may not devise pretextual excuses to deny women control over their reproductive rights. Once that rule is scrapped, states will be unleashed to regulate abortion out of existence within their borders.

Even if this ruling does uphold Whole Woman’s Health and gives abortion supporters something to cheer about, it won’t be for long. This Louisiana case is one of 13 state cases that have reached the federal court of appeals. The next step in appeal is the Supreme Court, and it is doubtful that all 12 of these other cases will be held off. Within the next year or two, one or more will reach the Supreme Court and the threat to Roe v. Wade becomes more manifest, given the makeup of the Court.

The ray of sunshine for reproductive rights advocates in all this comes from those states whose legislatures are passing legislation that will protect a woman’s right to an abortion even if Roe v. Wade is overturned. New York’s governor just signed the Reproductive Health Act into law. Other states, such as New Jersey, California, Illinois, and Maryland are some of the states that legislatively or through their state constitutions protect a woman’s right to abortion.

Whatever happens with this Louisiana case, two things will remain in contention. One, the issue of abortion will remain unsettled and a flashpoint for many who see it as a pivotal and political issue on women’s healthcare, decisions about who controls their lives, and about their faith and those who hold opposing views. And two, what is the role of precedent in our federal court system? While each seems separate, their entanglement around abortion may have far-reaching ramifications.—Carole Levine

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Carole Levine

Carole Levine is a principal consultant at Levine Partners, providing consulting services to small and medium-sized nonprofit organizations. She has held senior management positions in four national nonprofits: The National PTA (Deputy Executive Director); Communities in Schools (Vice President of Expansion and Technical Assistance); The Family Resource Coalition (Director of Technical Assistance); and National Lekotek Center (Director of Development). Carole holds a BA in education and political science from Washington University, and an M.Ed. in Early Childhood Leadership and Advocacy from National Louis University. Carole has served on the boards of numerous organizations, holding national positions on the board of National Council of Jewish Women and on the International Council of Jewish Women. She is currently the Chair of Courts Matter Illinois, serves on the board of Chicago Women Take Action and is active on the Promote the Vote Illinois Coalition. Carole is passionate about purposeful work, justice for all, advocacy and her family (which includes 6 amazing grandchildren!).

More about: Nonprofit NewsPolicyReproductive JusticeSCOTUS Decisions & The Aftermath

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Back to the Future? Making the Case for Reproductive Justice
Dr. Tiffany Manuel
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
The Human Impact of the Global Refugee Crisis Must Be Understood—And Acted Upon
Anmol Irfan
Funding Reproductive Justice and the Future of Abortion Access
Kitana Ananda

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Back to the Future? Making the Case for Reproductive Justice
Dr. Tiffany Manuel
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.