logo
Donate
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
    • Glossary
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Magazine
  • Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Opportunity Zones Provide New, If Flawed, Community Investment Vehicle

Martin Levine and Steve Dubb
February 21, 2018
Photo Credit: Official White House Photo by Sheahlah Craighead

February 13, 2018; Next City

The recently enacted $1.5 trillion tax bill included within it a provision, authored by Senators Cory Booker (D-NJ) and Tim Scott (R-SC), designed to encourage investment in low-income communities.

The relevant bill section, titled the “Investing in Opportunity Act,” permits governors to designate low-income census tracts in their states as “Opportunity Zones.” To qualify as “low-income,” the census tract must have as a poverty rate of at least 20 percent and median family income no greater than 80 percent of the median for the overall region. Designations must be made no later than April 22nd and will last for ten years. States that fail to designate zones by the due date will be ineligible for the program.

These provisions, as described by Black Enterprise, permit “would-be investors to defer capital gains recognition and the associated tax if they invest the gains in new Opportunity Zones located in ‘low-income community’ census tracts.”

In other words, if you bought stock in a company and that stock gained value, you can sell the stock for a profit and defer capital gains tax if you invest the gains in an Opportunity Zone. This approach provides an incentive for investing in communities that have, historically, not received investment.

A region, once tagged as an Opportunity Zone, will retain that status for a decade. Of course, such a designation may open other doors for assistance, be it at the local, state, or federal level, depending on what legislators and regulators do.

There is also a restriction in the legislation that says that no more than 25 percent of eligible census tracts may be selected as Opportunity Zones, a provision that is likely meant to concentrate limited investment dollars for greater impact. As a result, each state must decide which low-income tracts it wishes to select as priority zones. In Missouri, for example, the state has issued a request-for-proposals. Proposals are due to the governor by March 21st, leaving the governor’s office a month to select from among the proposals submitted.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Investment in Opportunity Zones is expected to occur through federally chartered Opportunity Funds. Individuals and corporations that sell stock and purchase investments in these funds will have their capital gains taxes deferred until they exit the funds. These funds will be “certified by the US Treasury and…required to invest at least 90 percent of their investment dollars into businesses or properties located in designated Opportunity Zones.”

The Economic Innovation Group has estimated that there are $2.3 trillion in unrealized capital gains, meaning that individuals and corporations are holding onto securities that they would prefer to sell, in order to avoid paying capital gains tax. The idea behind the Opportunity Funds concept is that the funds could tap into this investment capital, since capital gains tax would be deferred until the money exits the fund—presumably this could create a pool of investment capital for the designated Opportunity Zone areas. The cost of this tax expenditure program is estimated to be $1.6 billion.

This approach echoes Clinton-era Empowerment Zones. Clinton’s approach had the federal government choosing the locations, rather than the states, and brought to bear an array of government programs, including tax credits for businesses which added jobs in the zone, rather than trusting the market impact of increased investment. The new program differs from the Empowerment Zone program in two key aspects: 1) It won’t be limited to a few cities and could benefit rural areas, as well as urban areas; 2) the tax benefits flow to investors (i.e., through deferred capital gains) rather than involving direct tax credits to businesses that locate in the designated communities.

The Empowerment Zone programs—in multiple variants and under both Republican and Democratic administrations (each administration called it something different)—were generally seen to have meager results. While it is hardly clear that the wealthy need another way to defer capital gains tax, the opportunity zone program, by creating a common pool of money that invests in businesses in the qualified area, does help prevent the situation of having a business move into a community, collect the tax benefit, and leave, which was a common problem of the Empowerment Zone program.

One major flaw in the bill, however, is the need to create Opportunity Funds and not use existing community development financial investment (CDFI) infrastructure that has been developed over the course of two decades and now constitutes a nationwide community investment system with over $120 billion in assets. According to Next City:

It is not yet clear whether any existing organizations will automatically qualify as Opportunity Funds. For example, the US Treasury has already certified more than a thousand community development financial institutions, although that certification only requires 60 percent of an institution’s investments be made into low- or moderate- income census tracts. The US Treasury also certifies community development entities, which provide access to the new markets tax credit program.

Similarly, “Some advocates see it as a lost opportunity that the Investing in Opportunity Act did not automatically designate minority-depository institutions, which already have a track record of serving many low-income communities, as eligible to receive investment from the program.” If only newly formed organizations will qualify to serve as managers of Opportunity Funds, there is a danger of the loss of local knowledge and experience that could slow the program down and weaken its effectiveness.—Martin Levine and Steve Dubb

About the authors
Martin Levine

Martin Levine is a Principal at Levine Partners LLP, a consulting group focusing on organizational change and improvement, realigning service systems to allow them to be more responsive and effective. Before that, he served as the CEO of JCC Chicago, where he was responsible for the development of new facilities in response to the changing demography of the Metropolitan Jewish Community. In addition to his JCC responsibilities, Mr. Levine served as a consultant on organizational change and improvement to school districts and community organizations. Mr. Levine has published several articles on change and has presented at numerous conferences on this subject. A native of New York City, Mr. Levine is a graduate of City College of New York (BS in Biology) and Columbia University (MSW). He has trained with the Future Search and the Deming Institute.

Steve Dubb

Steve Dubb is senior editor of economic justice at NPQ, where he writes articles (including NPQ’s Economy Remix column), moderates Remaking the Economy webinars, and works to cultivate voices from the field and help them reach a broader audience. Prior to coming to NPQ in 2017, Steve worked with cooperatives and nonprofits for over two decades, including twelve years at The Democracy Collaborative and three years as executive director of NASCO (North American Students of Cooperation). In his work, Steve has authored, co-authored, and edited numerous reports; participated in and facilitated learning cohorts; designed community building strategies; and helped build the field of community wealth building. Steve is the lead author of Building Wealth: The Asset-Based Approach to Solving Social and Economic Problems (Aspen 2005) and coauthor (with Rita Hodges) of The Road Half Traveled: University Engagement at a Crossroads, published by MSU Press in 2012. In 2016, Steve curated and authored Conversations on Community Wealth Building, a collection of interviews of community builders that Steve had conducted over the previous decade.

More about: Community DevelopmentNonprofit NewsPolicy

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

You might also like
Trump Moves to Gut Low-Income Energy Assistance as Summer Heat Descends and Electricity Prices Rise
Conor Harrison, Elena Louder, Nikki Luke and Shelley Welton
“Advocacy Works”: Nonprofit Status-Stripping Measure Dropped from Republican Budget
Isaiah Thompson
How Can a Perpetual Purpose Trust Build Community?
April De Simone, Adriana Abizadeh, Kevin Clegg and Paul MacArthur
In Asheville, A Community Gathers to Consider What “Resiliency” Requires
Steve Dubb
Cancer Research in the US Is World Class Because of Its Broad Base of Funding—with the Government Pulling Out, Its Future Is Uncertain
Jeffrey MacKeigan
Endowments Aren’t Blank Checks—but Universities Can Rely on Them More Heavily in Turbulent Times
Ellen P. Aprill

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
May 27th, 2:00 pm ET

Ask the Nonprofit Lawyer

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
June 26th, 2:00 pm ET

From Performance Management to Mutual Commitment

Fostering a Culture of Joyful Accountability

Register

    
You might also like
A close-up of a man with dark brown skin sitting outside in a park with a white towel around his neck. An older woman with brown skin sits next to him, wiping her neck with her towel in the heat.
Trump Moves to Gut Low-Income Energy Assistance as Summer...
Conor Harrison, Elena Louder, Nikki Luke and Shelley Welton
A view of the US Capitol against a blue sky.
“Advocacy Works”: Nonprofit Status-Stripping Measure...
Isaiah Thompson
US Capitol Building
Tax Provision Would Give Trump Administration Unilateral...
Rebekah Barber and Isaiah Thompson

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.