logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

The Plastics Lobby vs. Our Future on Long Island and in the World

Marian Conway
May 20, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
“bags,” by Velkr0

May 16, 2019; Center for Public Integrity

The US economy is ostensibly driven by the supply and demand in the marketplace. While the market often seems to have a mind of its own, as in past crazes like Beanie Babies, people still attempt to steer it, regardless of potential damage.

The plastics industry, a significant piece of the global economy, is in the spotlight these days, with ever-increasing damage done to oceans, fish, and wildlife by the material that does not biodegrade. The way trash is handled is particularly problematic. The industry has spent years sending the message that recycling would solve our problems. Time has proven that wrong.

In 1988, New York’s Suffolk County on Long Island, with overwhelmed landfills and unhappy residents, determined that the problem had reached a tipping point. The county legislators took the leap in 1988 and passed a ban on plastic bags, the first of its kind in the country. The plastic industry took it as a throwing down of the gauntlet.

“We had never seen lobbyists like this before,” said Steven Englebright, the chief sponsor of the bill. “The B.S. came in by the shovel-load.”

It took 30 years to execute the ban, but Suffolk County, in January of 2018, put a 5-cent fee on plastic and paper bags. Suffolk reports that 1.1 billion fewer bags were circulated from businesses into the use/trash stream in just that one year. The rest of the state of New York joined the ban a little over a year later with the governor’s signature in April.

“It’s gratifying, but we still have so much more plastic going into the waste stream,” said Englebright, now a New York state assemblyman. Action, he said, could have been taken much earlier. “We really should not have had a 30-year delay.”

Bans like these do not sit well with the plastic industry—or with ALEC, the American Legislative Exchange Council, a conservative think tank that creates templates for bills to move their business-friendly agenda. ALEC is a $10 million 501c3 public charity that boasts a quarter of all state legislators as members. The Plastic Industry Association worked with ALEC from 2013 thru 2017 to create “preemption” bills, a strategy that ALEC uses to make laws that stop states from regulating activities, such as controlling pesticides, using the argument that local laws can confuse businesses and consumers:

In September 2015, ALEC approved a template for preempting local regulation of disposable containers and bags, complete with an easy-to-fill “[Insert Jurisdiction]” blank. Now, about a dozen states have passed some version of plastic preemption—including Arizona in 2016.

The Plastics Industry Association affirms it was not involved that model policy development. The industry has spent decades promoting recycling, although the market for recycling is poor, and has gotten worse since China has begun to refuse American trash to recycle. About a dozen states now have regulations to stop regulations on plastic, while 8 million tons of the 300 million tons of plastic thrown out annually end up in the ocean.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

“The industry has kept us from confronting plastics for decades through corporate lobbying and threats of litigation,” said Jennie Romer, a lawyer, longtime anti-plastics activist and founder of the website PlasticBagLaws.org. “Billions of single-use plastic items have made it into our environment because of this.”

“We believe uncollected plastics do not belong in the environment,” the Plastics Industry Association, a key trade group, wrote in a statement after declining an interview. “The problem is that waste management practices and infrastructure did not keep pace with the changing economy.”

The group argued that plastics are more environmentally friendly than alternatives—using fewer resources to create, while also making end products lighter—and are crucial for global commerce.

The industry saw danger signs in disposing of plastics in the 1960s, holding a conference on packaging waste in 1969. Recycling became the favored option; the industry formed the Council for Solid Waste Solutions “to promote that option—along with incinerating—even though the recycling is limited, vendors prohibit plastic bags because they clog up the machinery, and incinerating produces air pollution.”

“No doubt about it, legislation [restricting plastics] is the single most important reason why we are looking at recycling,” said Wayne Pearson, the then-executive director of the Plastics Recycling Foundation, an initiative that 45 companies like Coca-Cola and Pepsi formed in the mid-1980s.

For three decades, the plastics industry has been working overtime to get the message out that recycling is the answer to the millions of tons of single-use plastic waste. A project, “Toxic Docs,” based at City University of New York and Columbia University, uncovered internal documents that indicated “outright bans on polystyrene packaging were dropped with a promise of recycling by industry.” Waste Management, a company that handles garbage, reported receiving pressure to accept even more plastic for recycling.

As far back as 1972, one Society of the Plastics Industry document read, “Currently, there is no market for recycled plastics.” From 1987, a document acknowledged, “Recycling currently is not feasible for most multi-material packages.” And now, Waste Management filing stated, some plastics still have “no viable end markets.”

Public opinion still has a chance in the push-and-pull between the plastics industry, the work that ALEC has done, the needs of the public for plastics, and the science required to solve the recycling problems. Advocacy for less plastic has grown among the younger generation. “The water bottle has, in some way, become the mink coat or the pack of cigarettes,” said John Caturano, senior sustainability manager for Nestlé Waters North America, at a conference this March. “It’s socially not very acceptable to the young folks, and that scares me.” (Nestlé has pledged to make all its packaging “recyclable or reusable” by 2025.)

What started in Suffolk County, New York, has made its way across country to places like Hawaii, which would like to include straws and foam containers. Suffolk County moved ahead of the pack again, putting a ban against plastic straws in place for the first of next year.—Marian Conway

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Marian Conway

Marian Conway, the executive director of the NY Community Bank Foundation, has a Masters in Interdisciplinary Studies, Writing and a Ph.D. in Public Policy, Nonprofit Management. She has discovered that her job and education have made her a popular person with nonprofits and a prime candidate for their boards. Marian keeps things in perspective, not allowing all that to go to her head, but it is difficult to say no to a challenge, especially participating in change, in remaking a board. She is currently on eleven boards of various sizes and has learned to say no.

More about: EnvironmentNonprofit NewsPolicy

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
The Human Impact of the Global Refugee Crisis Must Be Understood—And Acted Upon
Anmol Irfan
Black Americans Need Reparations: The Fight for the CTC Highlights the Roadblocks
Jhumpa Bhattacharya and Trevor Smith
Edgar Cahn’s Second Act: Time Banking and the Return of Mutual Aid
Steve Dubb

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of...
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.