logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

University of Louisville Still in “Clean Up” Mode in Wake of Foundation Scandal

Marian Conway
October 31, 2017
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky / Ken Lund

October 27, 2017; WDRB (Louisville, KY)

According to local Louisville television station WDRB, “Nearly five months after a “forensic investigation” detailed up to $100 million in losses through mismanagement and over-spending at the University of Louisville Foundation, the university still hasn’t decided whether to sue former President James Ramsey or other former board members or employees of the foundation.”

One step has been taken, which involves the development of an agreement between the University of Louisville’s board of trustees and the separate board of the university’s supporting foundation. According to the agreement, the university agrees not to sue the foundation for financial malfeasance provided that the foundation handles its affairs properly going forward.

The financial practices under question occurred during the presidency of James Ramsey. Ramsey had the unusual role of serving as president of both the University of Louisville and the University of Louisville Foundation. Ramsey’s salary as foundation president, at over $2.4 million a year, dwarfed his salary as president of the university, which Inside Higher Ed estimated to be $345,000.

Ramsey’s tenure coincides with the period of time that the forensic audit covered. That audit revealed that the Foundation had engaged in a range of questionable financial practices, resulting in losses for the Foundation of up to $100 million. The audit was released over five months ago. In addition to the possibility of the foundation or university board pursuing action against Ramsey, suing former board members or the staff of the foundation is also on the table.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Our coverage of this issue of mismanagement has been extensive. We have covered the release of the forensic audit last June, the forced departure of the chief financial officer following that audit, the termination of a consultant’s contract two months ago who was arrested for theft, and the role of two local foundations who had financially supported the University foundation in pushing for the forensic audit in the first place and pushing for reforms to ensure that the practices revealed are fully addressed.

Many changes have already been effected since Ramsey’s resignation as foundation president in September of 2016. The board of directors was recreated in January of this year. While those involved have left, and the restructuring continues to evolve, the threat of lawsuits still hangs over the foundation. The foundation’s board does carry $25 million in Directors and Officers (D&O) insurance for protection against fraudulent acts; however, the better course would be to avoid being sued.

After months of closed-door meetings between the board of trustees of the university and the university foundation board, on Thursday, October 26th, the foundation’s board of directors approved the proposal by the U of L’s board of trustees which would keep the university from suing the foundation, “provided that the foundation continues to operate in the manner in which it’s committed to operate,” according to the foundation’s interim executive director, Keith Sherman.

Diane Medley, now the chair of the foundation’s board, stated that the agreement is intended to ensure that the foundation performs as a support organization independent from the university, which follows IRS regulations. Sherman said the agreement will “provide assurance and allay any concerns that what’s happened in the past isn’t going to happen again.”

No explanation has been offered as to why the university considered a lawsuit, and neither party has released a copy of the agreement to the public. Foundation officials have requested some minor revisions in the draft and expect it may be done by next week. Earl Reed, a foundation board member, stated that the pact contains “governance and operating procedures,” but David Grissom, who serves on both boards and is the chair of the university trustees, did not provide comment.—Marian Conway

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Marian Conway

Marian Conway, the executive director of the NY Community Bank Foundation, has a Masters in Interdisciplinary Studies, Writing and a Ph.D. in Public Policy, Nonprofit Management. She has discovered that her job and education have made her a popular person with nonprofits and a prime candidate for their boards. Marian keeps things in perspective, not allowing all that to go to her head, but it is difficult to say no to a challenge, especially participating in change, in remaking a board. She is currently on eleven boards of various sizes and has learned to say no.

More about: foundation funding university foundationsFinancial ManagementManagement and LeadershipNonprofit NewsOrganizational MismanagementScandals

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Hierarchy and Justice
Cyndi Suarez
Salvadoran Foreign Agent Law Threatens Human Rights Movements
Devon Kearney
Charitable Tax Reform: Why Half Measures Won’t Curb Plutocracy
Alan Davis
Healing-Centered Leadership: A Path to Transformation
Shawn A. Ginwright
Into the Fire: Lessons from Movement Conflicts
Ingrid Benedict, Weyam Ghadbian and Jovida Ross
How Nonprofits Can Truly Advance Change
Hildy Gottlieb

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Hierarchy and Justice
Cyndi Suarez
Salvadoran Foreign Agent Law Threatens Human Rights...
Devon Kearney
Charitable Tax Reform: Why Half Measures Won’t Curb...
Alan Davis

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.