logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

Six Elements of a Truly Annoying Cover Letter and One Key to a Good One

Ruth McCambridge
July 21, 2015

cover-letter-dear-sir

July 20, 2015; U.S. News & World Report, “Money”

 

The experience of applying for jobs can be excruciatingly disempowering. As a result, it comes as no surprise when people freeze and look for common defaults when writing their cover letters. But there is a way to interrupt the fear and loathing, and that is to focus on the “other”—or, in this case, the organization to which you are applying.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Alison Green writes a regular column for U.S. News & World Report where she takes on the job search among other issues. Yesterday’s column dealt with annoying cover letters from job applicants. And, indeed, there are some very common annoyances that may (and probably should) get you dismissed out of hand as relatively dippy.

What not to do:

  • Address the person hiring you as “Dear Sir(s).” Why would anyone wish to hire an individual in this decade who freely illustrates just how dense they are about gender issues? Sounds like an accident waiting to happen and—well, just annoying!
  • Get the organization’s name wrong, or get the job title wrong somewhere in your application. People sometimes do this if they are cutting and pasting between multiple job applications, but it results on occasion in laughable gaffes. You get what you pay for in the time you save not carefully copy-editing and tailoring.
  • Overselling yourself as compared to other possible candidates. There is absolutely nothing persuasive in declaring yourself “perfect for the job” or “uniquely qualified.” Better that you describe the job as perfect for you, as in “I can’t imagine anywhere I would more like to work at this point.” Just be sure to get the name of the organization right.
  • Selling yourself on the basics. “I work well independently and as part of a team.” Yes, and?
  • Befuddling with meaningless buzzwords. That’s as applied to oneself, as in, “You will find I’m a hard-working, detail-oriented, proactive self-starter with great communication skills.” Half the time, these claims are negated elsewhere in the application, and why would anyone want someone like that around the office?
  • Pushing for an independent meeting outside of the process. “I don’t believe a cover letter and résumé can really tell you what I have to offer, so I hope to meet in person.” Actually, if your communication skills are so darn great, you should be able to express in writing why you and that job are such a great fit.

But from here, I am going to take off from Alison’s list a bit and give one tip about what is appreciated and what will make an impression that will place you in the small pile of follow-ups: Talk about what it is in the job or the organization or both that intrigues you. Nothing is more impressive than a candidate who knows and values something or even a lot about the organization they are applying to. Most people who hire want the energy that comes with legitimate interest and understand that there is a kind of magic in the right match—a chemistry born of shared purpose and aligned self-interest, and if the candidate has already explored that and still wants to work there…well, then I’m interested in them.—Ruth McCambridge

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: Equity-Centered ManagementNonprofit News
See comments

Call to action
You might also like
Rethinking Nonprofit Survival: Why Partnership Is the New Leadership
Michael Anderson, Rumbidzai Mufuka and Adelaide Rohrssen
Can We All Become Nonprofit Consultants?
Michelle Flores Vryn
How to Transform Strategic Planning for Social Justice
Nick Takamine
Learning from a Near-Death Experience: How to Survive a Budget Crisis
Donnie Maclurcan
Merging Missions: Starting with Relationships and Shared Authority
Hoang Murphy
Scaling Impact: How Mergers Can Advance Housing in Communities
Priya Jayachandran

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
Two people shaking hands in agreement.
Rethinking Nonprofit Survival: Why Partnership Is the New...
Michael Anderson, Rumbidzai Mufuka and Adelaide Rohrssen
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, "Alison Stine: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025: Alison Stine
Alison Stine
A woman sits across from another woman at a small table in conversation.
Can We All Become Nonprofit Consultants?
Michelle Flores Vryn

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.