Ford Foundation: Can Capitalism Be Made to Work Better for Society?

Print Share on LinkedIn More



September 29, 2014;Ford Forum (Ford Foundation)

In the Ford Forum, the inaugural issue of what appears to be intended as a regular publication “to inspire fresh thinking and constructive dialogue,” Ford Foundation CEO Darren Walker poses an interesting question to a number of experts: “Where Markets Lead, Will Justice Follow?” Referring to foundations as products of the capitalist economic system, Walker asks, “How do we support efforts to change a system in which our own grantmaking resources are cultivated? How can we inform a more inclusive capitalism in which free enterprise flourishes and yet—as our mission and values demand—a broader justice prevails?”

Before we go on, we would like to invite you to respond to the question at the Ford Forum itself.

Walker is trying to bridge a contradiction in the structure of American philanthropy. Foundations are creatures of the “bounties of the markets” but are challenged “to help individuals and communities become more resilient in the face of market-driven inequality and the social instability and economic insecurity” that are the products of the economic system—along with private foundations like the Ford Foundation.

Yale’s Nobel Prize-winning economist Robert Shiller, whose brilliant book, The Subprime Solution, provided a compelling analysis of the global financial crisis of the last decade, responds to Walker’s question with an argument for the importance of government in making the economic system more inclusive. For example, he proposes “government subsidies to offer financial advice for low-income people,” much like the notion of legal services for the poor. As he notes, “You have rich people with their lawyers and poor people who just don’t have a clue.” Shiller’s experience in monitoring the collapse of the mortgage system is a case study of the imbalance between the rich and the poor—and government’s weak efforts to help homeowners who faced foreclosures and frequently lost their homes.

Raymond Offenheiser, the president of Oxfam America, looks at the roles of nonprofits like Oxfam and other advocacy organizations in holding multinational corporations “accountable to social and environmental standards.” It means having NGOs work and find common ground with corporations. Offenheiser notes that “92 percent [of investment in developing countries] is foreign direct investment from private capital,” meaning that it is going to be Unilever or Starbucks rather than USAID or the World Bank that will be a partner for international NGOs. The challenge, he says, is “that we needed to be thinking about poverty not as the absence of public goods—which leads to a gap-filling path—but rather as social exclusion, which meant that we should be looking at the barriers that limit people’s access to those things they need, such as education, health, credit, jobs and housing, and that could be addressed through policy, practice changes and, perhaps, better institutional performance by either the state or the market.”

The formula, Offenheiser concludes, has three components: “an effective state; active citizens holding that state accountable; and inclusive markets, with citizens also holding those markets accountable to some degree.” Oxfam America views itself as crafting strategies for holding corporations accountable, citing as one example its “Behind the Brands” scorecard, which ranks the largest food and beverage corporations on seven issues: land investment policies, investments in water, carbon footprint and commitment to climate change issues, labor practices, investments in small farms, inclusion of women, and transparency of finances and other business practices. Ultimately, the improvement of the corporate role in society is to advance “from corporate responsibility to corporate accountability,” with Offenheiser noting that corporate social responsibility is “companies monitoring themselves,” resulting in some improvements in corporate behavior but falling short of what many countries needed: the incorporation of those voluntary standards into governmental regulatory systems that mandate corporate compliance.

Offenheiser’s analysis stands somewhat in contrast with the observations of the Aspen Institute’s Judith Samuelson, who leans toward a stronger reliance on corporate self-regulation. “Global corporations command extraordinary resources and distribution systems, talent and problem-solving skills that we need to address complex problems,” Samuelson says, “Whether we like it or not, we don’t have global governance, but we do have global companies, and the behavior of multinationals is likely to shape the norms and help define what rights are respected.”


Although she acknowledges that many global businesses have fallen short on human rights, particularly consumer brands like Apple and the Gap that have relied on overseas manufacturing and assembling, Samuelson says that companies have responded to NGO pressures (and the fear of social media) and shown that “they learn from their mistakes,” many transforming themselves to become “the better actors today.” She says such changes are simply “about smart business practices and attracting and maintaining customer loyalty.” Perhaps it is because of the swift and necessary kick some corporations have needed and deserved from NGO watchdogs, but Samuelson foresees a dynamic of NGOs asking, “How do we work alongside business?” and “Where is the business opportunity to be a first mover?” A former Ford Foundation staffer herself, Samuelson suggests that foundations should be funding nonprofits to work with business.

Overall, the Ford Forum essays reviewed here express a core belief in the essential capitalist nature of the economic system, but with different definitions of reliance and trust on corporate self-regulation and self-improvement. MIT’s Otto Scharmer encapsulates the theme with a call for “tri-sector innovation” involving nonprofits working across sectoral lines. There is not a lot in these essays that suggests that the power of corporations is so pervasive and enormous that tri-sector partnerships might tilt strongly in favor of businesses and against NGOs and even government. Nonprofit watchdogs of corporate power have traditionally been underfunded by philanthropy. For the implicit agenda of the Ford Forum essays to meet Walker’s challenge of foundations “striv[ing] to ‘strengthen and improve’ the economic system in which it operates and flourishes,” foundations have to strengthen the system of nonprofit watchdogging of corporate power and corporate excesses, else corporations escape the scrutiny they need if they are going to be held accountable to higher environmental and social norms.—Rick Cohen

  • Rakoto Sariteny

    In fact Capitalisme can not work without the invisible Hand . Capitalisme without Invisible Hand is no more Capitalism .
    In a word let go and let God .
    But as God is working in an invisible way the mean is to promote transparency to see the work of the perverse Hand ,which is the tool of devil .
    A helping Hand can not overcome devil ,but the glory of God can do it as nothing is impossible for God , give the opportunity for everyone to show the Glory of God as everyone is called to Hollyness .

  • Pat Nichols

    NPQ’s work is always interesting but there’s even more than usual to like about this piece.

    First, Offenheiser’s suggestion that we see poverty as social exclusion has wonderful, productive implications and it offers a framing that bridges not only between business and the other sectors but between right and left (those distinctions not always being the same, of course). Second, Samuelson’s recognition that there is are no effective mechanisms of global governance to mandate certain corporate behaviors reminds us that whether or not we think such governance and mandates desirable, if we want to achieve things over the short term we will need to rely more on self-policing and inter-sectoral collaboration.

    What is under-emphasized here, I think, is the power of customers themselves to enforce good behavior.

    Finally, Rick Cohen’s own comment that funders should strengthen the power of nonprofits to serve as watchdogs for corporations rounds out the circle. Consumers can’t reward good behavior or punish bad unless someone–nonprofits, government or media–is in a position to call that behavior to our attention.

    It seems to me that this piece implies a very useful insight about markets. Markets are best seen as dialogs about the value of goods and services, a form or communication that depends upon effective government action to function and that, at its best is astonishingly effective, precisely because markets are–like other forms of communications–social, organic and adaptable. Far from being, as those on the left often believe, inherently anti-social or coercive, when effective markets oblige business, large and small, to respond to the needs of individual consumers. This is why, after 60 or 70 years of global market growth, a smaller percentage of the world’s population lives in or near poverty than at any time in human history.

    On the other hand, it is also why (contra the free-market right) markets cannot be relied upon to resolve all of the world’s problems, and sometimes will actively contribute to them. Managing this risk requires an active meta-dialog with the other sectors to inform, confine and mold markets to conform with broader social needs.

    Thanks, again, for this particularly thoughtful piece.


  • RobinRosenblatt

    It is Time Standup for Israel – The Israel Longhorn Project – A Holistic Project –

    “We need sponsors and donors”

    We will bring Texas Longhorns home to Israel to help ranchers and farmers. Texas Longhorn cattle are
    pre-adaptive to the desert environment.

    The European beef cattle brought to Israel 60 years ago were bred for a rich pasture environment, not
    for Israel’s semi-arid desert environment.

    The Galilee is overflowing with non-native shrubs that burn at a higher temperature igniting
    trees and cause forest fires. The soil is very dry and lacks healthy bacteria and fungi.

    This is a Holistic approach to enhance ecosystem processes thereby build soil health, increase water and
    carbon absorption by increased grass growth and return life to dry Galilean soils. Benefits regional environments, community economics, social and international relations.

    Israeli ranches and farmers are under attack by jackals, wolves and Arabs. Texas Longhorn cattle can solve the above environmental problems and stop the attacks by simply lowering their sharp horns. Support the Israel Longhorn Project help put a stop to it now!

    How much land needs to be stolen and how many families need to be attacked and even murdered before we help them? Help lower the price of meat and feed the Children.

    Working with: The Israeli Border Police, the New Shomrim or the New Guards, Israel’s Agriculture Department, the Prime Minister’s office and many Israeli Ranches.

    With a nominal donation from you can help make a difference. A $60 donation from 2,000 of you will help end this nightmare. Help us reach our goal of $120,000 to start the project; the second year we will need $140,000, in the follow three years we will need $315,000 to make project self-supporting in the 5th year.

    Robin Rosenblatt, M.Sc. Animal Science, former IDF and past anti Terrorist Agent
    The Israel Longhorn Project
    Nonprofit 501(c) 3 #74-3177354
    22 Yarnall Place
    Redwood City, CA 94063
    Tel: 650.631.9270 / Cell: 650.339.0269
    Nonprofit 501(c) 3 #74-3177354

    For Domestic Transfer of Funds and or electronic transfer: Wells Fargo Bank, 420 Montgomery St., San Francisco California 94104, Bank Routing #121042882, Bank Routing for wire transfer # 121000248, Account # 2526430067, Bank Tel:1-916-480-3190, For Electronic or International Transfer of Funds, Use this: Wfbius6s

    The problem:–yw

    Occam’s Grazer: An In-depth Introduction to Holistic Management

    Holistic Management by Allan Savory

    The project is helping Israel, East Africa and hopefully Jordan