logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

23 States Sue Feds to Block HHS “Conscience” Rule Permitting Refusal of Care

Ruth McCambridge
May 24, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

May 22, 2019; FierceHealthcare

Twenty-three states joined in a suit filed on May 21st to block a new federal regulation known as the Protecting Statutory Conscience Rights in Health Care rule. Published yesterday in the Federal Register, it would give health care providers, insurers, and employers—as well as a wide range of others, such as ambulance drivers, receptionists, and customer service representatives at insurance companies—the right to refuse to provide or pay for medical services that violate their religious or moral beliefs. These services would include abortion and other reproductive services, as well as assisted suicide. Additionally, any health care provider would risk federal funding if they do not respect the right of these workers to deny service.

If not blocked, the rule will take effect in July of this year.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

The suit, which was spearheaded by New York Attorney General Letitia James, charges that “that the rule violates several federal laws, including those governing Medicare and Medicaid, civil rights statutes and a statute requiring hospitals to provide emergency care.”

James commented in a statement:

Once again, the Trump Administration is putting politics over the health and safety of Americans. The federal government is giving healthcare providers free license to openly discriminate and refuse care to patients—a gross misinterpretation of religious freedom that will have devastating consequences on communities throughout the country. When the health of our residents is at stake, and the safety of vulnerable populations hang in the balance, we cannot rest until this “health care refusal” rule is stopped.

In addition, a separate lawsuit filed by California Attorney General Xavier Becerra alleges that the new rule impedes basic care for patients and that it’s lawless and reckless, encouraging discrimination against patients who are “vulnerable,” including women and patients from the LGBTQ community.—Ruth McCambridge

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: Health JusticeNonprofit NewsPolicyReligious/Faith-Based

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Human-Centered Design for Behavioral Health
Sonia Sarkar
Pro-Black Organizations Lead the Way for Workplace Mental Health and Wellbeing
Nineequa Blanding
Measuring Healthcare Equity in North Carolina
Sonia Sarkar
Race, Class, and Climate: Organizing for a Better Future in Pueblo, Colorado
Jamie Valdez
A Growing Movement of Sabbaticals for BIPOC Leaders
Nineequa Blanding
Evolving a Culture of Care: Lessons from Third Root Community Health Center
Vanessa Nisperos, Emily J. Kramer and Julia Bennett

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
A Black woman with an afro, standing against a pink wall. She is covering most of her face with her sweatshirt.
Human-Centered Design for Behavioral Health
Sonia Sarkar
Pro-Black Organizations Lead the Way for Workplace Mental...
Nineequa Blanding
Measuring Healthcare Equity in North Carolina
Sonia Sarkar

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.