logo
Donate
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
    • Glossary
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Magazine
  • Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Ask the Rich for Their Time Says Study

Ruth McCambridge
November 12, 2010

November 11, 2010; Source: New York Times | A 2010 “Study of High Net Worth Philanthropy” [PDF] sponsored by Bank of America Merrill Lynch and performed by the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana State University was released Tuesday and reveals, among other things, that wealthy people who volunteer give significantly more than those who do not.

Specifically, when the individuals volunteer more than 200 hours, on average they give $75,662 compared to the $46,414 given by those who do not volunteer. The study also revealed that giving as a proportion of income declined among high net worth people in from 3.7 percent two years ago to 3.4 percent in 2009.

The study also reveals that high net worth givers are more likely to take risks with their own personal assets than they are with money they have invested for charity. According to the Times, “With personal assets, 35 percent were willing to take substantial or above-average risk, while only 23 percent would do so with philanthropic assets. Twenty-six percent would take no risk with the philanthropic funds, compared with 10 percent on personal holdings.”

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

One very hopeful point is that almost 95 percent of the wealthy givers who participated in the study expressed some or a great deal of confidence in nonprofit organizations, in comparison to 89 percent voicing confidence in individuals, 68 percent in corporations, and 58 percent in the federal government. Congress came in sadly at 32 percent.

The study is well worth your time to read for yourself, but one final point—the number one reason these donors decided to discontinue funding an organization was “too frequent solicitations.”—Ruth McCambridge

About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: Nonprofit News

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

You might also like
Amid Disappearing Federal Funds, Could New York Be a Model for City-Level Health?
Rebecca L. Root
Madeleine L’Engle’s Books Were Never Meant to Be “Safe”
Charlotte Jones Voiklis
The Human Cost of Cutting Medicaid
Rebekah Barber
As Long as Social Media Is Around, Can We Really Break Free of Overconsumption?
Anmol Irfan
Flood Insurance Is Becoming Unaffordable—Can Community-Based Catastrophe Insurance Help?
Cinnamon Janzer
Arab and Muslim Advocates Fight Back Against Federal Repression
María Constanza Costa

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
May 27th, 2:00 pm ET

Ask the Nonprofit Lawyer

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
June 26th, 2:00 pm ET

From Performance Management to Mutual Commitment

Fostering a Culture of Joyful Accountability

Register

    
You might also like
US Capitol Building
Tax Provision Would Give Trump Administration Unilateral...
Rebekah Barber and Isaiah Thompson
A piggy bank wearing a graduation hat and standing on a pile of cash, symbolizing how endowments for academic institutions can be accessed in difficult times.
Endowments Aren’t Blank Checks—but Universities Can Rely...
Ellen P. Aprill
Saving AmeriCorps: What’s at Stake and Why We Must Act Now
Hillary Kane

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.