logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Census Data and Shifts in National Representation

Rick Cohen
December 23, 2010
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

December 21, 2010; Source: The Hill | The operating environment for nonprofits is, to a significant extent, driven by public policy and nonprofits play a significant role in gathering census data so many readers will be interested in the implications of the 2010 Census count, released yesterday by the Census Bureau.

Based on population shifts, Texas will gain four House seats and Florida two. Gaining single seats are Arizona, Utah, South Carolina, Nevada, Georgia, and Washington. Losing two seats apiece are New York and Ohio and losing single seats are Illinois, New Jersey, Iowa, Massachusetts, Missouri, Louisiana, Pennsylvania, and Michigan.

This is the first census ever that didn’t give California an additional seat. Although the nation’s total population grew 9.7 percent since the 2000 Census, it grew 14.3 percent in the South and 13.8 percent in the West compared to 3.2 percent in the Northeast. Nevada had the biggest proportional increase among states, growing 35.1 percent, while Michigan was the only state to show a net decline, just less than one percent.

These numbers are only preliminary, but the implications are pretty obvious. The gaining states lean Republican and the losing states generally lean Democratic. State legislatures’ reapportionment decisions will determine which seats are lost and where the new seats get placed. Nonetheless, many of the 63 new Congressional seats won by Republicans in the last election were in the states that stand to gain through the Census.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

However, the results might not be as clear as they seem at first glance. In the list of Tea Party-backed or -affiliated winners in the House and the Senate provided by the Washington Post, the states where Tea Partiers claimed four House seats were the rustbelt states of Ohio and Illinois which both lose total seats based on the new census.

Tea Partiers only got three in Florida and two in Michigan, New York, Arizona, Wisconsin, South Carolina, and Texas. The Tea Party phenomenon, as we have covered here at NPQ, is the most significant political change of the past year and one that has implications for the nonprofit sector and political organizing.

Though Republicans in general stand to gain from the new Census data, how reapportionment occurs in the states with strong Tea Party electoral showings could, instead weaken the Tea Party gains from the 2010 Congressional election results.—Rick Cohen

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Rick Cohen

Rick joined NPQ in 2006, after almost eight years as the executive director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy (NCRP). Before that he played various roles as a community worker and advisor to others doing community work. He also worked in government. Cohen pursued investigative and analytical articles, advocated for increased philanthropic giving and access for disenfranchised constituencies, and promoted increased philanthropic and nonprofit accountability.

More about: Nonprofit News

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

NPQ_Winter_2022Subscribe Today
You might also like
Remaking the Economy: Caring for the Care Economy
Steve Dubb, Adria Powell and Jenn Stowe
Race, Class, and Climate: Organizing for a Better Future in Pueblo, Colorado
Jamie Valdez
Faith as a Pathway to Climate Action
Anmol Irfan
Countering Authoritarianism: Forging a Progressive Response to Fragmentation
john a. powell and Sara Grossman
America’s Broken Safety Net—and How to Address It: An Interview with Alissa Quart
Steve Dubb and Alissa Quart
New York Brings Power to the People
Johanna Bozuwa

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
AOC’s “Tax the Rich” Dress Dazzles Met Gala, while...
Anastasia Reesa Tomkin
Foundation Giving Numbers for 2020 Show 15 Percent Increase
Steve Dubb
Strike MoMA Imagines Art Museums without Billionaires
Tessa Crisman

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.