logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Do Corporate Tax Incentives Work? Not Too Often

Steve Dubb
September 20, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
Urban Land Institute.

September 12, 2018; Twin Cities Pioneer Press

“From 2000 to 2014, Minnesota issued $1.4 billion in TIF (Tax Increment Financing) loans and financial obligations, making the state the fourth biggest user of TIF in the United States,” writes Frederick Melo in the Twin Cities Pioneer Press.

NPQ has covered TIFs before. As we wrote this past February, “TIFs are a method of financing development by borrowing against the anticipated benefits of economic growth.” They do this by diverting a portion of taxes in a designated zone to help finance development. The way this works is you set a baseline property tax rate where a city anticipates future development, then borrow against anticipated increases in property tax to fund the development for a specified period of time—say, 15 years. TIFs are often a leading vehicle to subsidize corporations.

Of course, borrowing is not cost-free—if the growth doesn’t occur, then the city must cover the loans with other revenues. And, if the growth does occur, then the city can pay back the loans, but schools and other public amenities may lack resources because growth outpaces resources and the money that would have funded those services is instead paying back the loans.

In a new 72-page report from the nonprofit Lincoln Institute on Land Policy, called Improving Tax Increment Financing (TIF) for Economic Development, University of Illinois at Chicago economist David Merriman notes that this dynamic sometimes “may result in higher taxes or lower services elsewhere, depending on how overlying governments, such as school and special districts, respond.”

But is tax increment financing worth these aches and pains? Not often, Merriman contends. Reviewing 30 studies, Merriman finds “in most cases, TIF has not accomplished the goal of promoting economic development.”

Merriman elaborates:

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Many recent findings show that TIF does little to deliver economic growth and sometimes simply relocates economic activity that would have occurred elsewhere without TIF…communities should use it cautiously to avoid unintended consequences, such as diverting increased property tax revenues from counties, school districts, and other overlying governments; obscuring government financial records; and facilitating unproductive fiscal competition between neighboring jurisdictions.

Merriman notes that California, the first state to make heavy use of TIFs, now permits TIFs under very limited conditions, namely:

  • TIF districts are restricted to low-income or high-crime areas;
  • school entities are prohibited from participating;
  • other overlying governments (non-school) must consent to use their tax revenues for the TIF;
  • extensive reporting and transparency provisions are required;
  • extensive public input is required, including provisions under which a popular vote could prevent further action on the plan;
  • twenty-five percent of property tax increment revenues must be used to increase, improve, and preserve affordable housing; and
  • issuance of bonds by TIF districts now requires 55 percent voter approval.

In his report, Merriman urges states to employ California-like provisions to better track TIF use. Merriman also writes that before a TIF district is created, states should “require proof that the planned development would not occur ‘but for’ the tax increment financing.”

TIF success stories, Merriman notes, do exist. Merriman provides case studies from Atlanta, rural Montana, and St. Louis. In St. Louis, a $158.2-million, 25-year TIF helped push forward a $2-billion project on city’s west side known as Cortex, which has led to a new economic hub. But St. Louis has had over 100 TIFs and most have fallen short. One reason, Merriman suggests, why Cortex has done better than many other TIF-funded projects is because the project did not rely on the TIF, but instead used the money from the TIF to generate lasting community partnerships.

Earlier this year in an op-ed, Melo noted that the attraction of TIF is that “cities and economic-development authorities don’t have to come up with their own tax dollars up front to acquire blighted land, demolish abandoned gas stations,” and so on. But there’s a cost: “For upward of 20 years, funds generated…don’t go to the city to fix your potholes or pay librarians or firefighters or cops” (or schools or other government programs that fund nonprofits). In St. Paul, Minnesota, nine percent of city property tax is diverted this way.

It is, Melo adds, a little like if you or I said to the local government, “Instead of paying you guys my property tax increase, can I use that money to clean the asbestos out of my attic?”—Steve Dubb

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Steve Dubb

Steve Dubb is senior editor of economic justice at NPQ, where he writes articles (including NPQ’s Economy Remix column), moderates Remaking the Economy webinars, and works to cultivate voices from the field and help them reach a broader audience. Prior to coming to NPQ in 2017, Steve worked with cooperatives and nonprofits for over two decades, including twelve years at The Democracy Collaborative and three years as executive director of NASCO (North American Students of Cooperation). In his work, Steve has authored, co-authored, and edited numerous reports; participated in and facilitated learning cohorts; designed community building strategies; and helped build the field of community wealth building. Steve is the lead author of Building Wealth: The Asset-Based Approach to Solving Social and Economic Problems (Aspen 2005) and coauthor (with Rita Hodges) of The Road Half Traveled: University Engagement at a Crossroads, published by MSU Press in 2012. In 2016, Steve curated and authored Conversations on Community Wealth Building, a collection of interviews of community builders that Steve had conducted over the previous decade.

More about: corporate tax incentivesNonprofit NewsPolicy

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
The Human Impact of the Global Refugee Crisis Must Be Understood—And Acted Upon
Anmol Irfan
Black Americans Need Reparations: The Fight for the CTC Highlights the Roadblocks
Jhumpa Bhattacharya and Trevor Smith
Edgar Cahn’s Second Act: Time Banking and the Return of Mutual Aid
Steve Dubb

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of...
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.