October 3, 2012; Source: Argonaut
The Santa Monica, Calif. City Council recently decided against allowing AIDS Project Los Angeles to advertise its AIDS Walk event on city buses. According to The Argonaut, the decision is because current city policy “permits commercial firms to advertise on its buses but not nonprofit organizations.” A lawsuit is now pending, as AIDS Project Los Angeles argues that this policy denies them their right to free speech.
Sign up for our free newsletter
Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
“This absurd new policy targets not only AIDS Walk Los Angeles ads, but all other nonprofit ads which help foster community spirit and provide valuable information to the public,” according to Executive Director of AIDS Project Los Angeles Craig E. Thompson. “Santa Monica city leaders are in effect providing an economic advantage to corporate interests and a disadvantage to community advocates. We’re calling on our supporters to join us in speaking out against this twisted set of priorities.”
According to the city’s transportation policy, as quoted by The Argonaut, “A commercial advertisement has as its primary purpose the promotion of a product for sale or a service for hire by the public.” Interestingly, the implication is that nonprofits do not offer a product for sale or a service for hire by the public, so it seems a dynamic distinction is being made between for-profit businesses and nonprofit organizations, but isn’t a service a service even when it occurs for the benefit of the public? The AIDS Walk is neither a product nor a service, of course. But the intent is to raise funds to provide services to the public and to raise awareness of the services being offered. If a for-profit corporation wanted to simply raise awareness about the company and what it does, would that be allowed?
Another interesting item is the argument reportedly made by City Attorney Marsha Moutrie, who instructed the City Council, in The Argonaut’s words, “that if the city permitted non-profits to advertise on its buses, it could be compelled to allow organizations whose messages were not in line with Santa Monica’s views to run advertisements as well.” That viewpoint does seem to fly in the face of free speech, since it would limit anyone’s right to take an ad on the buses. And then, who decides what “Santa Monica’s views” are?
Interesting precedents being set in Santa Monica. –Rob Meiksins