logo logo
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

Is the Nike Corporation Flirting with Disaster?

Ruth McCambridge
September 5, 2018
Nike.

September 4, 2018; MarketWatch

Is the Nike organization flirting with disaster with its ad campaign featuring Colin Kaepernick promoting sacrifice for one’s beliefs? We doubt it, but that does not make us less happy about its celebration of the 30th anniversary of its “Just Do It” campaign. In fact, it makes us happier. We don’t think Nike itself would sacrifice much in a quest for social justice, and to us, that means the marketing department of this massive corporation has calculated its risks, which would have to include the potential loss of its contract to clothe the NFL teams, and placed itself on the right (as in more lucrative) side of history. Their market research must show there are more potential customers on the side of the players’ right to political free speech—and to legitimate protest about the longstanding problem of police violence against Black folk—than not, and that is indeed good news.

Believe in something, even if it means sacrificing everything. #JustDoIt pic.twitter.com/SRWkMIDdaO

— Colin Kaepernick (@Kaepernick7) September 3, 2018

The nature of the ad, however, might make you believe the corporation is going out on a limb in pursuit of its ideals. The day’s media coverage of all of this has been interesting, with some premature schadenfreude emanating from the Wall Street Journal when the company’s stock dropped by 3.2 points as of close of business yesterday. (Adidas shares fell by a smaller 2 percent.) Meanwhile, individuals took to social media to post pictures of themselves burning articles of Nike clothing. But, Jelani Cobb of the New Yorker writes:

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

The shoe burners feel that Nike has elevated a man of questionable motives and suspect patriotism. But their point is undermined by a different set of images and videos, detailing the final moments of Walter Scott, Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, and the nameless others who have died in similar circumstances. Nike gambled that a greater portion of the world understands where Kaepernick is coming from.

Sally Jenkins of the Washington Post agrees, saying demographics are on Nike’s side.

Millennials, those Americans between the ages of 22 and 37, are projected to surpass Baby Boomers as the nation’s largest living adult generation in 2019, and fully 44 percent of them are of some race other than white. For post-millennials that number rises to 48 percent, and for post-post-millennials (American children under age 10), it grows to more than 50 percent.

These consumers, according to William Frey, author of Diversity Explosion: How New Racial Demographics Are Remaking America, have a different set of values that inform their buying behavior, including personal screens for social responsibility.

Jenkins also points out that Nike, probably more than many corporations, understands the dynamics of movements based in youth culture. “What it sees in Kaepernick,” she writes, “is not just a digital poster, but the face of an entire new wave. In that sense, Nike’s campaign is not radical. It’s the furthest thing from it. It’s just the future.”

So, it’s up to us to keep it real and radical as long as necessary—and to keep the heat on.—Ruth McCambridge

About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: Corporate Social ResponsibilityNonprofit NewsPhilanthropy

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

You might also like
Report Uplifts New and Old Challenges Facing Nonprofits
Rebekah Barber
Shifting the Balance: Centering Local Leadership in Global Nonprofit Partnerships
Jennifer Johnson
Beyond Grant Capital: What the Buen Vivir Fund Experience Teaches Us
Gaithiri Siva and Joanna Levitt Cea
Merging Missions: Starting with Relationships and Shared Authority
Hoang Murphy
REI Co-op Members Back Workers, Reject Board-Imposed Candidate Slate
Bernadette King Fitzsimons
Nonprofit News Media Leaders Are Struggling to Stop Leaning on the Foundations That Say They Should Branch Out More
Katherine Fink

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
June 26th, 2:00 pm ET

From Performance Management to Mutual Commitment

Fostering a Culture of Joyful Accountability

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
July 24th, 2:00 pm ET

Organizing in Divided Times

The Relational Infrastructure We Need to Protect Democracy

Register

    
You might also like
A thoughtful young Asian woman sits at her table, appearing concerned as she navigates challenges on her laptop at home.
Report Uplifts New and Old Challenges Facing Nonprofits
Rebekah Barber
Conservatives Attack Nonprofits on Capitol Hill
Isaiah Thompson
A yellow diamond sign says “CAUTION: Future World and Local Leaders at Work and Play."
Shifting the Balance: Centering Local Leadership in Global...
Jennifer Johnson

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.