logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Kentucky Integration Success Threatened by Neighborhood Schools Push

Martin Levine
March 8, 2017
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
“|1|2|3|4|5|6|7|8|” by Gerry Dincher

March 4, 2017; Washington Post

Is there a public school district superintendent or school board president who would not like to start their day reading this Washington Post description of their work?

White and black and poor and rich children share schools to a greater extent here than in most other large districts across the country, leading to friendships across the usual social divides and giving rise to what school officials say are stronger academic outcomes for disadvantaged students.

School officials in Louisville, Kentucky, should have had that pleasure Monday morning. Yet, in another example of the political tug-of war-over public education, members of the Kentucky legislature are trying to undo the policies that have made the district’s students thrive.

The district, which combines urban Louisville with parts of suburban Jefferson County, was formed during the tumultuous days of forced desegregation that followed the passage of federal civil rights laws. Even after the courts removed the requirement of forced busing to achieve integration, the Jefferson County school district remained committed to providing a working solution. By combining parental choice, a strong selection of magnet schools, and a stated policy of racial and economic balance, the district has maintained a stable, integrated reality. Parents have chosen to have their children bused to their schools of choice so that “fewer than 15 percent of students attend a school in which either the white or nonwhite student population exceeds three-quarters of total enrollment.”

The district’s commitment to racial diversity is clear. As with other districts that NPQ has looked at, learning in an integrated classroom benefits all students:

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Research shows that isolating poor children is an ill-advised strategy for schools looking to boost low-income learning. Jefferson schools still struggle with achievement gaps—61 percent of white elementary students are proficient or better in reading, compared with 31 percent of black students and 43 percent of Latino students. But the district has found that children in poor areas who attend mixed-income schools outperform neighbors who go to high-poverty schools.”

State Rep. Attica Scott, who is a graduate of the Louisville schools, described the meaning of the current approach to the Post. “It was this opportunity to be with kids who weren’t like me—to be able to develop those relationships and connections and to get to know each other” in ways that would not be possible without a structured approach to creating integrated schools.

Why change what seems to be a working approach to the real challenges of urban education? Because it is not honoring other expectations that some have for public education. For the legislators supporting a bill that would require Louisville public schools to do away with their commitment to integrated education, the higher value at stake is the ability for every student to attend his or her neighborhood school. State Rep. Kevin D. Bratcher told the WP that the legislation “aims to bring common sense to a system that is unfair to children who can’t get into schools around the corner or across the street from where they live.”

We have to look at what we’re giving up for desegregation. It’s harder for children in faraway schools to participate in extracurricular activities and for their parents to make it to PTA meetings and teacher conferences.

Is it only distance and logistics that makes neighborhood trump integration, as the Republicans’ bill wishes to do? Is this the sole factor pushing state legislators to step in to meddle with a local school district where most parents like things the way they are? Or is race the real issue?—Martin Levine

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Martin Levine

Martin Levine is a Principal at Levine Partners LLP, a consulting group focusing on organizational change and improvement, realigning service systems to allow them to be more responsive and effective. Before that, he served as the CEO of JCC Chicago, where he was responsible for the development of new facilities in response to the changing demography of the Metropolitan Jewish Community. In addition to his JCC responsibilities, Mr. Levine served as a consultant on organizational change and improvement to school districts and community organizations. Mr. Levine has published several articles on change and has presented at numerous conferences on this subject. A native of New York City, Mr. Levine is a graduate of City College of New York (BS in Biology) and Columbia University (MSW). He has trained with the Future Search and the Deming Institute.

More about: public schools racial diversityNonprofit NewsPolicy

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
The Human Impact of the Global Refugee Crisis Must Be Understood—And Acted Upon
Anmol Irfan
Black Americans Need Reparations: The Fight for the CTC Highlights the Roadblocks
Jhumpa Bhattacharya and Trevor Smith
Edgar Cahn’s Second Act: Time Banking and the Return of Mutual Aid
Steve Dubb

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of...
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.