November 15, 2010; Source: The Examiner | If a solid portion of the new Tea Party-energized Republican members of Congress gets its juice from a libertarian ideological perspective, it may be useful to understand what libertarians would want to do with public policy and how libertarian policies would affect the nonprofit sector.
Senior staff of the libertarian Cato Institute such as VP Gene Healy have seen the need to tell the American public just what they might expect from people with, “hello, I’m a libertarian” name tags. Libertarians, Healy said, don’t rank as high as liberals and conservatives on “agreeableness” and “extraversion”, but tend to be more “dispassionate and cerebral.”
Sign up for our free newsletter
Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
He suggests that “liberals have the most ‘feminine’ cognitive style” among political types compared to libertarians’ “most ‘masculine'” approach. Of concern to nonprofits is not just how well libertarians play in the sandbox, but what they want to do with the toys—in this case the federal budget. In the November 17 Wall Street Journal, Cato purchased a full-page ad outlining libertarian budget cutting beliefs and goals. The ad contains the following of import to nonprofits:
- “Get . . . the government out of the housing business,” including ending HUD subsidies, which Cato believes “have concentrated poverty and fed urban blight,” and end support of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, with predicted savings of $45 billion a year;
- Convert Medicaid to a “consumer-driven health plan through vouchers” and convert Medicaid to a fixed block grant program (and, apparently, undo President Obama’s comprehensive health insurance reform), saving $1 trillion during the next decade;
- “Phase out [Social Security] as a mandatory program and [offer] an alternative voluntary system of private accounts,” saving $50 billion annually;
- Withdraw from Iraq and Afghanistan and reduce the “unnecessary overseas missions” Cato charges have resulted from “military overreach,” saving $100 billion a year (not including the $125 billion saved in Iraq and Afghanistan);
- Eliminate federal support for K-12 education, which Cato says “have cost American taxpayers $1.85 trillion since 1965 without noticeably improving outcomes,” saving $40 billion annually;
- “Cut federal (wage and benefit) compensation by 10 percent to save $20 billion annually.”
As Healy notes, the libertarian movement, with worshippers of economist Frederick Hayek (author of the Road to Serfdom) and acolytes of the Tea Party’s revolutionary war rhetoric, constitute a “strange tribe.” No longer an isolated tribe associated with renegade Texas Republican Congressman Ron Paul, the libertarians are in government now, many associated with Ron’s son Rand, newly elected senator from Kentucky. Nonprofits had better get used to understanding the language of libertarians. Anyone interested in a Hayek reading group?—Rick Cohen