logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Louisiana Defused This Affordable Housing Dispute Before It Could Go Nuclear

Spencer Wells
June 1, 2017
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
“Nuclear waste.” Credit: Alex Antropov

May 30, 2017; New Orleans Times-Picayune, “Real Estate”

It is not easy for a state legislature to resist preempting local government from addressing a local problem. In fact, preemption is the go-to strategy when private interests want to run roughshod over local needs and local democratic processes. Disregarding local process, a powerful lobby just needs to find a state representative or two to pass a law that takes away the rights of local citizens. Easy peasy.

Make no mistake: Preemption is a weapon of mass destruction that is used by state officials to retaliate against a single proposal in a single jurisdiction. The New Orleans Advocate reviews this issue in greater depth in an article entitled, “Bill to block affordable-housing mandate in New Orleans dies in House committee.” In this case, preemption proponents didn’t even wait for the democratic process in New Orleans to play out. The state Senate voted quickly to bar any Louisianans from acting to address affordable housing and then sent the bill to the state House.

This week’s vote in the state House Commerce Committee stopped the bill from moving to the whole House. The lone Republican House member voting against the bill was concerned the city might turn to the state for financial help if they were blocked from making their own plans.

A main proponent of the preemption bill, Jon Luther, CEO of the Home Builders Association for Greater New Orleans, sees regulating the construction of large multifamily rental developments as the edge of a slippery slope. Interfering with “market forces” would put New Orleans in league with the socialist city governments of the northeast and northwest.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

How bad is the problem of affordable housing in New Orleans? Most of the development since 2005’s Hurricane Katrina has focused on upper income housing—and for good reason. It is a better return on investment to build for the upscale market. According to the New Orleans Tribune,

New Orleans has only 47 affordable rental units for every 100 low-income residents. Thirty-seven percent of households in the city are paying half of their income for housing. And 36 percent of renters pay more than 50 percent of their income for housing, a more than 100 percent increase from 2004, when about 24 percent residents spent more than half their earnings on housing. The New Orleans metro area ranks second in the top 10 worst metro areas for renters, according to the Make Room Initiative, a nationwide campaign launched in 2015 to raise awareness about and bring an end to the rental affordability crisis in America.

Was race an issue? The New Orleans Advocate article helps connect the dots: “The plan was intended to bring New Orleans in line with a controversial U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development rule that cities must work to foster racial and class integration in their neighborhoods if they want to continue to receive federal funding.”

The fact that a state preemption effort has been turned back is noteworthy. The problem of states barring local action is endemic. Earlier this year, the mayor of Jacksonville, Florida, became the leader of an informal campaign to combat state preemption efforts around the country.

Kriston Capps in CityLab defines preemption as a partisan weapon used by Republican controlled legislatures against urban Democratic strongholds. Cleveland is one exception that proves the rule. In December, with the encouragement of Cleveland city officials, the state of Ohio barred local municipalities from enacting a local minimum wage. At issue in that case was a citizen initiative, which was not supported by many local Democrats, that would have put the issue to a vote. The Republican governor and the Republican-controlled General Assembly were only too glad to help the local Democrats.—Spencer Wells

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Spencer Wells

Since his retirement in 2013, Spencer Wells volunteers as the Community Manager of the Rental Housing Information Network in Ohio (RHINO) and as financial secretary of Cleveland Lead Advocates for Safe Housing (CLASH). As a community organizer for 45 years, Spencer’s professional work focuses on tenant rights and community development issues. Spencer, Janet and three cats live on 10 acres in rural Western Pennsylvania where Spencer tends a big garden and a small woodlot while Janet audits, blogs, quilts, and photographs.

More about: affordable housingElectoral and LobbyingNonprofit NewsPolicy

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
The Human Impact of the Global Refugee Crisis Must Be Understood—And Acted Upon
Anmol Irfan
Black Americans Need Reparations: The Fight for the CTC Highlights the Roadblocks
Jhumpa Bhattacharya and Trevor Smith
Edgar Cahn’s Second Act: Time Banking and the Return of Mutual Aid
Steve Dubb

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of...
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.