logo logo
giving banner
Donate
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Social Justice
    • Racial Justice
    • Climate Justice
    • Disability Justice
    • Economic Justice
    • Food Justice
    • Health Justice
    • Immigration
    • LGBTQ+
  • Civic News
  • Nonprofit Leadership
    • Board Governance
    • Equity-Centered Management
    • Finances
    • Fundraising
    • Human Resources
    • Organizational Culture
    • Philanthropy
    • Power Dynamics
    • Strategic Planning
    • Technology
  • Columns
    • Ask Rhea!
    • Ask a Nonprofit Expert
    • Economy Remix
    • Gathering in Support of Democracy
    • Humans of Nonprofits
    • The Impact Algorithm
    • Living the Question
    • Nonprofit Hiring Trends & Tactics
    • Notes from the Frontlines
    • Parables of Earth
    • Re-imagining Philanthropy
    • State of the Movements
    • We Stood Up
    • The Unexpected Value of Volunteers
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Leading Edge Membership
  • Newsletters
  • Webinars

Nonprofit Newswire | Doping Allegations Could Harm Lance Armstrong’s Foundation

Bruce S Trachtenberg
August 4, 2010

 

August 3, 2010; Source: Associated Press | Champion cyclist Lance Armstong is used to being in the public spotlight, but the kind of attention he’s attracting from accusations that he used performance enhancing drugs might do more than just damage his wholesome public image. His charitable foundation, a major funder of cancer research, might also suffer irreversible harm.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Armstrong, along with other champion racers, has been accused by a former teammate of doping. Although he hasn’t been charged yet and has said he’s never used drugs to increase his endurance, the Associated Press reports that some observers say his foundation, the nation’s 10th largest funder of cancer, based on revenue in 2008, could suffer if Armstrong can’t convincingly clear his name. “They [the foundation] are not going to be able to thrive if the person who is the spirit behind it is in trouble,” said Ken Berger, CEO of Charity Navigator, a watchdog group that analyzes 5,000 nonprofits in the U.S. “It is just going to devastate them.”

That said, Armstrong is convinced that his foundation, which last year took the operating name Livestrong, will not be hurt. In a statement to the Associated Press, Armstrong, a seven time Tour de France winner, said, “No one on our foundation team is going to be distracted by this witch hunt.” Zeta Interactive, a firm that tracks what people are saying online about celebrities, is less optimistic about Armstrong’s future. People are stating to use words such as “scandal,” “lie,” and “steroids,” when they talk about Armstong. As a result, Al DiGuido, Zeta’s CEO, says rather bluntly: “Anyone or anything associated with Lance Armstrong should be very worried right now.” The master of pedaling has a different kind of peddling to do now.—Bruce Trachtenberg

Our Voices Are Our Power.

Journalism, nonprofits, and multiracial democracy are under attack. At NPQ, we fight back by sharing stories and essential insights from nonprofit leaders and workers—and we pay every contributor.

Can you help us protect nonprofit voices?

Your support keeps truth alive when it matters most.
Every single dollar makes a difference.

Donate now
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

You might also like
SNAP Crisis Exposes Deadly Nonprofit Assumptions
James A. Lomastro
Blocking Authoritarianism: Steps Nonprofits and Foundations Must Take
Saqib Bhatti
Climate Conservationists Push for People to Live with Nature Rather Than Against It
Anmol Irfan
On Boycotts and Blackouts, Mobilizing and Organizing: Understanding the Basics
Steve Dubb
The People Say No: MediaJustice’s Advocacy Against AI Data Center Expansion
Iris M. Crawford
How the Drug War Undermined Fair Housing—and What to Do About It
Yusuf Dahl

Upcoming Webinars

Group Created with Sketch.
January 29th, 2:00 pm ET

Participatory Decision-making

When & How to Apply Inclusive Decision-making Methods

Register
Group Created with Sketch.
February 26th, 2:00 pm ET

Understanding Reduction in Force (RIF) Law

Clear Guidance for Values-centered Nonprofits

Register

    
You might also like
An image of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
University Professors Are Latest Targets of FOIA Requests
Rebekah Barber
During a protest, a person holds up a cardboard sign that reads, “No Justice No Peace.”
What Is “Civil Society”—and How Is It Under Threat?
Rebekah Barber
A red circle overlayed on a yellow background with three multi-colored dots on each side. In the center it reads, " Isaiah Thompson: Staff Picks for 2025"
Staff Picks for 2025 (So Far): Isaiah Thompson
Isaiah Thompson

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

  • About
  • Advertise
  • Careers
  • Contact
  • Copyright
  • Donate
  • Editorial Policy
  • Funders
  • Submissions

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Nonprofit Quarterly | Civic News. Empowering Nonprofits. Advancing Justice.
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.