{source}[[span style=”float: right; border-left: 1px solid gray; border-bottom: 1px solid gray; margin: 0pt 0pt 5px 5px; padding: 0pt 0pt 0pt 5px;width:250px;”]][[h3]]Related Articles[[/h3]][[br /]]{loadposition related}[[/span]]{/source}
July 23, 2010; Source: The Trentonian | Sometimes, little governmental decisions tell you a boatload about what’s going on (or not) in the minds of top officials. New Jersey governor Chris Christie last week vetoed legislation that would have funded women’s health clinics, health insurance for low-income adults, and tax credits for homebuyers.
Sign up for our free newsletters
Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.
By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.
Although the state’s $29.4 billion budget had not included funding for these items, legislators said that they found $7.5 million in unused money that could have restored funding for the women’s health clinics. The Governor declined to agree, questioning the “legitimacy” of the funding source. The health insurance would have cost an additional $24.5 million and the tax credits $100 million.
Maybe Governor Christie could have debated the homebuyers tax credits as potentially assisting people who don’t need the subsidy or in the end benefiting sellers and brokers rather than purchasers. But the health insurance and the women’s health clinics were small items that would have helped people clearly in need. The Governor’s veto in this case appears to be less a fiscal decision than a social value statement.—Rick Cohen
