logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Nonprofit Reports on Texas’s Problem with Barriers to Voting

Angie Wierzbicki
June 20, 2017
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
By Jay Phagan from Taft, Texas (Vote Here Sign) [CC BY 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

June 18, 2017; Houston Chronicle

A new report from a voting rights advocacy organization shows hundreds of would-be voters were delayed from voting, while others were almost turned away entirely during the 2016 presidential election because of confusion over current state voter ID laws.

The Texas Civil Rights Project (TCRP) recently released a report that cited these issues, among others, noting that minority groups were particularly affected during the 2016 election cycle.

TCRP Voting rights director Beth Stevens said, “Through our Election Protection Coalition, we heard directly from thousands of voters about the barriers they faced in our electoral system.”

About 4,000 incidents were logged, which the report is based on. Of the 3,100 callers who specified their race, 52 percent identified as Latino or Hispanic and 20 percent as black or African-American. Stevens noted it’s very likely many more people had issues at the polls but didn’t report them.

Of the incidents tracked, most were issues related to polling place problems, voter registration status, or voter ID requirements.

Zenen Jaimes Perez, communications director for the nonprofit, said the organization has trained researchers who go through a process checking data in verifying claims made by callers. Hundreds of reported cases throughout the state were left out, as they did not add up during the verification process.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

The report also claimed the number of provisional ballots, which are given to voters when their registration information is in doubt, increased statewide during the November elections.

According to the report, issues that affected voters at the polls included:

  • Not being on the voter rolls because of slight discrepancies in their names or addresses
  • Confusion about voter identification requirements often prompted by misleading information at polling locations or from poll workers
  • Polling location problems such as polling sites being changed or eliminated. Most of these reports came from predominately black areas of Houston.
  • Wait times of more than an hour, resulting from either too few poll workers or machines being inoperable or unused.

All of this comes after the 2011 Texas law that required all voters to present a government-issued ID. That law was found to be discriminatory against minorities and the poor by a federal appeals court in July of last year. Texas and the Department of Justice reached an agreement to allow voters without an accepted form of ID to cast a ballot if they showed a voter registration card, a document from an approved list, and a signed declaration saying they could not obtain acceptable identification.

Governor Greg Abbott and supporters say the tough ID law is needed to prevent voter fraud. But opponents warn that these requirements disenfranchise those who have difficulty obtaining an ID. Currently, over 600,000 Texas voters lack a suitable ID under this law. Approximately 8.5 million Texans voted in the November 2016 election.

Even with the amended rules for voting due to the court’s ruling, many polling sites during early voting had signs that said voter ID was required, with no reference to allowable exceptions.

The confusion over voter ID is significant because officials pushing voter verification laws often argue the measures aren’t discriminatory if voters receive a free card identifying them or possess an acceptable form of ID and can produce other verification. But this report shows the issues in Texas still exist even with those safeguards in place.—Angie Wierzbicki

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Angie Wierzbicki

Angie Wierzbicki is Executive Director for Cullinan Park Conservancy in the suburbs of Houston, TX. She has been involved in nonprofit leadership roles for almost 10 years, mostly in Texas. Angie has an MS in Recreation, Park and Tourism Administration from Western Illinois University and a BA in Broadcast Journalism from the University of Southern California. In addition to nonprofits, Angie has served in the Peace Corps in Malawi, Africa, and dabbled in retail management.

More about: voter suppression voting rightsElectoral fraud and campaign hackingNonprofit NewsPolicy

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

NPQ_Winter_2022Subscribe Today
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
The Human Impact of the Global Refugee Crisis Must Be Understood—And Acted Upon
Anmol Irfan
Black Americans Need Reparations: The Fight for the CTC Highlights the Roadblocks
Jhumpa Bhattacharya and Trevor Smith
Edgar Cahn’s Second Act: Time Banking and the Return of Mutual Aid
Steve Dubb

Upcoming Webinars

Remaking the Economy

Black Food Sovereignty, Community Stories

Register Now
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of...
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.