logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Not Feeling the Board: A Little Berkshire Backstory

Ruth McCambridge
June 7, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

Daderot [GFDL or CC-BY-SA-3.0], from Wikimedia Commons
June 5, 2018; The Berkshire Eagle

An article in the Berkshire Eagle the other day revealed the views of two trustees of the Berkshire Museum, Carol Riordan and Nancy Edman Feldman, who dissented in the decision to sell artworks to fund a “transformation” of the museum. The description characterized the discussion among trustees as a snowballing of handleable financial concerns that turned excessive in its solution. The “transformation” included replenishing the endowment and installing interactive exhibits, for which Riordan and Feldman suggested the evidence of community interest was pretty thin.

Riordan, who was the former treasurer of the board, and Feldman both quit the board in protest after the vote to sell last year. They believe that trustees and Executive Director Van Shields could have done much more to avoid the quick cash option of selling the art.

In auctions and private sales in April and May, the museum raised more than $42 million.

Riordan says she is confounded by Massachusetts Attorney General Maura Healey’s decision to allow sales of the art to proceed. “I don’t understand how the attorney general came to the conclusion that the museum needed $55 million to be viable. I feel it can keep its doors open for much less,” Riordan said. “I find the outcome of that incomprehensible. I don’t understand where they came up with that being needed.” Then she launched into a description of a process which may be all too recognizable for nonprofits who have been through a visioning process funneled toward a preferred outcome.

The Berkshire Eagle’s Stephanie Zollshan reports,

Looking back, Riordan takes issue with many steps the museum took on its way to art sales. They include initial work on a master plan, what she sees as gaps in its community outreach and the “party line” eventually reached about a proposed “new vision.”

As the process of pondering the museum’s future advanced behind closed doors, Riordan said the idea of pursuing a “transformative” change gained steam.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

In October 2016, trustees gathered at a retreat reviewed their options, as presented by a consultant.

Securing $25.6 million, an option labeled “opening bid,” would allow the museum to close its recurring deficit, address key needs and provide “baseline” renovations.

But the “silver” option, achieved through finding $69.7 million, would allow the museum to tackle a major building renovation, including creation of a new atrium and entrance.

The consultants’ scenarios were eventually reviewed by the court.

“I didn’t see something ‘transformational.’ That was the jargon used,” she said, adding that the discussion was framed as dire—a last-ditch attempt to avoid closing. “That was the management line—that we can’t tweak things at the edges. I didn’t agree with how the museum wanted to reposition itself…I thought a lot of the process was words that don’t mean a lot.”

“The board was convinced that there was no future in continuing to do what we were doing.”

As treasurer, Riordan said that there were other, more incremental ways to address the problems that undeniably existed. Instead, a capital campaign was suspended and the director of advancement was let go. Feldman, who had raised money for public television, said she volunteered to raise money from people from New York and Boston who own second homes in the Berkshires, but her suggestions went nowhere.

It is to be expected, of course, that in a time of radical change in the institution, some disagreements would exist on the board even to the point of sparking resignations. These kinds of peeks at what the process felt like may help us all think about how to approach what we have in front of our own boards.—Ruth McCambridge

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Ruth McCambridge

Ruth is Editor Emerita of the Nonprofit Quarterly. Her background includes forty-five years of experience in nonprofits, primarily in organizations that mix grassroots community work with policy change. Beginning in the mid-1980s, Ruth spent a decade at the Boston Foundation, developing and implementing capacity building programs and advocating for grantmaking attention to constituent involvement.

More about: art museumsArts and CultureBoard GovernanceNonprofit News

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Sankofa Philanthropy: Hip Hop’s Sixth Element
Jason Terrell
Gumbo for the Struggle: Recipes of Liberation from the Cultural Kitchen
Dr. Ayodele Nzinga
Cooperatives as Ancestral Technology
B. Vanessa Coleman
Rebuilding a Cultural Economy: A Story from the Nipmuc Nation
Andre Strongbearheart and Carlos Uriona
Imagining New Worlds: Using Science Fiction to Build a Solidarity Economy
izzy sazak
How Philanthropy Can Show Up for an Arts Solidarity Economy
Cate Fox and Nichole M. Christian

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
An image of four men, from the waist down in athletic wear. The man in the front is wearing red sweatpants and holding a boom box.
Sankofa Philanthropy: Hip Hop’s Sixth Element
Jason Terrell
Bowl of gumbo with prawns, okra and sausage on a dressed table.
Gumbo for the Struggle: Recipes of Liberation from the...
Dr. Ayodele Nzinga
Cooperatives as Ancestral Technology
B. Vanessa Coleman

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.