logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

NY and NJ File Suit to Challenge Feds on Donor Disclosure Changes

Michael Wyland
May 9, 2019
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
“Confidential stamp.”

May 7, 2019; Associated Press via US News & World Report

The attorneys general of New York and New Jersey have filed a lawsuit to find out how the IRS made the decision in July 2018 to stop requiring many tax-exempt organizations to disclose donor information on their annual Form 990 filings. The disclosure change affected most nonprofit entities that are not public charities and private foundations covered under Section 501c3 of the Internal Revenue Code. The lawsuit seeks the information in part because the plaintiffs object to the donor disclosure requirements being dropped without the opportunity for public notice and public comment.

States claim that obtaining donor information from 990 filings is important to their ability to perform oversight and, if necessary, investigation of nonprofit practices including political advocacy. The primary concern expressed is the ability to understand how donors and donations to 501c4 social welfare organizations, sometimes referred to as “dark money” groups, interrelate and are used. “My office depends on these critical donor disclosure forms to be able to adequately oversee nonprofit organizations in New York,” New York AG Letitia James said in a statement.

In a seven-page IRS Revenue Procedure issued last July, the IRS explained that there was no statutory requirement that the IRS collect donor information from groups other than 501c3 organizations, even though that practice had been implemented by agency regulation. The regulation implementing donor disclosure includes a provision authorizing the Treasury to issue exemptions to affected organizations. The application of IRS discretion is explained briefly in the announcement:

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

The IRS does not need personally identifiable information of donors to be reported on Schedule B of Form 990 or Form 990-EZ in order for it to carry out its responsibilities. The requirement to report such information increases compliance costs for some private parties, consumes IRS resources in connection with the redaction of such information, and poses a risk of inadvertent disclosure of information that is not open to public inspection.

NPQ reported on one example of disclosure of confidential donor information where the 501c4 National Organization for Marriage had its records disclosed by an IRS employee and ultimately published by the Human Rights Campaign and the Huffington Post.

The frustration of some states’ charity regulators at the IRS action is understandable because most states don’t have their own statutes requiring nonprofits to disclose donor information to state governments. Even though the Form 990 donor information has been confidential under federal law, some states have sought to require 501c4s and other non-501c3 organizations to send copies of their hitherto IRS-required donor lists as part of their state compliance filings.

For legal, regulatory, and political reasons, it’s unlikely that the New York-New Jersey lawsuit and a similar previously filed Montana-New Jersey lawsuit will result in IRS reinstatement of the rescinded disclosure requirements. What the lawsuits do alert us to is that regulation and oversight of social welfare/secret money groups, labor unions, chambers of commerce, and other non-charitable nonprofit organizations is becoming more difficult. Only congressional action to pass a new law—one able to withstand a legal challenge likely reaching the US Supreme Court—is likely to bring increased disclosure about money flows and activities of many nonprofit groups.—Michael Wyland

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Michael Wyland

Michael L. Wyland currently serves as an editorial advisory board member and consulting editor to The Nonprofit Quarterly, with more than 400 articles published since 2012. A partner in the consulting firm of Sumption & Wyland, he has more than thirty years of experience in corporate and government public policy, management, and administration.

More about: Dark Moneydonor disclosureManagement and LeadershipNonprofit NewsPolicy

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
The Human Impact of the Global Refugee Crisis Must Be Understood—And Acted Upon
Anmol Irfan
Hierarchy and Justice
Cyndi Suarez
Black Americans Need Reparations: The Fight for the CTC Highlights the Roadblocks
Jhumpa Bhattacharya and Trevor Smith

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of...
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.