logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

Nonprofit Withdraws 25,000 Monthly Pledges at 100x the Amount

Carrie Collins-Fadell
May 10, 2016
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print

Low-overhead-limbo

April 29, 2016; The Guardian

A few days ago, NPQ covered the fiasco that occurred when the crowdsourcing platform Kimbia failed in the midst of a “day of giving,” leaving community foundations and nonprofits all over the country scrambling to save their relationships with donors. This story is just that little bit worse.

It is the stuff that a nonprofit executive team’s nightmares are made of: A donor trusts you with their personal financial information, and are made sorry for it.

Concern Worldwide is an international humanitarian organization dedicated to tackling poverty and suffering in the world’s poorest countries, but right now, it’s spending considerable energy on damage control with 25,000 donors after it mistakenly took 100 times the amount supporters had pledged in automatic debit payments from their bank accounts. Just to be clear about what this might look like, one supporter’s direct debit for May was £1,700, when she had only pledged to donate £17 per month.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

While Concern Worldwide sent emails to donors warning that the overcharges were forthcoming the damage was done. Presumably understanding that it had just managed to combine two of the financial things many people hate the most—having money taken without authorization and dealing with their bank—Concern Worldwide promised to pay all of the money back and to meet any additional charges its supporters may have been hit with as a direct result of the error. There was no estimate on how much additional money the mistake will cost Concern if they did cover donors’ banking fees incurred because of the errors. The group also had to communicate that they would not be asking anyone for bank records to issue a refund, as they worried about scammers moving into the aftermath of the incident to prey on donors. Sadly, the error will have its hardest impact on recurring donors who pledge monthly support rather than make one large donation every year. A real backbone in fundraising, these donors turn over their debit or credit cards to support the organization monthly.

The organization’s UK executive director, Rose Caldwell, said:

We are conducting a full investigation into this matter and want to reassure the public that we are putting robust measures in place to make sure this does not happen again. Without the support of our donors, Concern would not be able to deliver its life-saving humanitarian work to vulnerable people worldwide.

But how many of the organization’s lower level donors will stick around for that to be tested?—Carrie Collins-Fadell

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Carrie Collins-Fadell

Carrie is a nonprofit leader currently residing in Phoenix. An NPQ writer since 2013, she enjoys writing on a variety of topics, including legacy giving and animal welfare issues, and is always rooting for a Detroit renaissance.

More about: donor relationsFinancial ManagementFundraisingManagement and LeadershipNonprofit NewsOnline GivingOverhead costsTechnology

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Hierarchy and Justice
Cyndi Suarez
Why Tech Nonprofits Are Building Digital Tools for Racial Equity and Justice
Sakshi Udavant
Technology for Whom? Owning Our Platforms
Minsun Ji
A Better Way to Do Good: The Case for Comprehensive Community Care
Erin Mulligan Nelson
Grave Work
Phil Jones
How to Make Better Decisions Online
Josh Lerner and Rose Longhurst

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Hierarchy and Justice
Cyndi Suarez
Why Tech Nonprofits Are Building Digital Tools for Racial...
Sakshi Udavant
Technology for Whom? Owning Our Platforms
Minsun Ji

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.