logo
    • Magazine
    • Membership
    • Donate
  • Racial Justice
  • Economic Justice
    • Collections
  • Climate Justice
  • Health Justice
  • Leadership
  • CONTENT TYPES
  • Subscribe
  • Webinars
    • Upcoming Webinars
    • Complimentary Webinars
    • Premium On-Demand Webinars
  • Membership
  • Submissions

The More Radical the Change, the Greater the Need for Good Data

Martin Levine
April 27, 2018
Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
By Ted Eytan from Washington, DC, USA (DC Council Budget Vote – Wellness Tax 44400) [CC BY-SA 2.0], via Wikimedia Commons

April 22, 2018; Washington Post

Few would contest that our public school systems should be accountable to the communities they serve. But the issue of who will best represent that community has become quite controversial as school reform plows forward. In many cases, policymakers at the federal, state, and local levels concluded that locally elected school boards led to struggling educational systems. Ardent reformers created new accountability models that replaced direct local control. As they did so, they may have forgotten the need to gather good information about school performance that might be used to hold schools accountable.

Schools in Washington, DC, have been the proving ground for many of the choice-based school reforms that have been central to national efforts to improve education. Using test scores as their yardstick, supporters of the reform agenda claimed remarkable improvement, but the results seemed less reliable as evidence of mismanagement and data manipulation emerged. School personnel were found to have rigged test results under the pressure of a system that demanded constant improvement. High school graduation rates were found to have grown only because the district manipulated and ignored its own requirements.

With this much controversy and scandal surrounding their school system, the members of the DC Council are concerned that even basic data are unavailable. In the belief that accountability begins with having accurate and timely information, the Council is debating a bill that would establish a city agency responsible for gathering accurate data about their school district’s operations.

Sign up for our free newsletters

Subscribe to NPQ's newsletters to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

Council Member Mary Cheh told the Washington Post that a new city agency was needed because “we have been getting bad information—some of it just false, some of it misleading, some of it incomplete, and we can’t get a handle on what to do if we don’t know what’s happening.”

The importance of accurate and well publicized data was illustrated by retired educator and blogger G.F. Brandenburg, who examined results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, known as the nation’s educational score card, for the past two decades. Looking at data for fourth- and eighth-graders that could be broken down by ethnicity he found that “in every single one of twelve sub-groups, the rate of change in scores was worse (i.e., lower) after 2007 (when the chancellors took over) than it was before that date (when we still had an elected school board).” So long as this data was not publicly available, school leaders could tout their progress and claim their controversial strategies were succeeding.

For the DC City Council, allowing local oversight to be meaningful requires the ability to objectively know what works and what doesn’t. As councilmember-at-large Robert C. White Jr., who-co-introduced the bill, wrote in a statement, “Creating an independent education research entity will distance education from politics and ensure that the council has the tools it needs to perform oversight over our schools.”

With disruptive change a hallmark of school reform efforts, there’s a need for accountability. Every child deserves the best possible education and each year of inadequate schooling is a lost year that cannot be replaced. The Council’s willingness to invest in good data is a step in the right direction, but it needs to be matched with a willingness to let the data tell the story and not be managed or manipulated.—Martin Levine

Share
Tweet
Share
Email
Print
About the author
Martin Levine

Martin Levine is a Principal at Levine Partners LLP, a consulting group focusing on organizational change and improvement, realigning service systems to allow them to be more responsive and effective. Before that, he served as the CEO of JCC Chicago, where he was responsible for the development of new facilities in response to the changing demography of the Metropolitan Jewish Community. In addition to his JCC responsibilities, Mr. Levine served as a consultant on organizational change and improvement to school districts and community organizations. Mr. Levine has published several articles on change and has presented at numerous conferences on this subject. A native of New York City, Mr. Levine is a graduate of City College of New York (BS in Biology) and Columbia University (MSW). He has trained with the Future Search and the Deming Institute.

More about: education reformNonprofit NewsPolicy

Become a member

Support independent journalism and knowledge creation for civil society. Become a member of Nonprofit Quarterly.

Members receive unlimited access to our archived and upcoming digital content. NPQ is the leading journal in the nonprofit sector written by social change experts. Gain access to our exclusive library of online courses led by thought leaders and educators providing contextualized information to help nonprofit practitioners make sense of changing conditions and improve infra-structure in their organizations.

Join Today
logo logo logo logo logo
See comments

Spring-2023-sidebar-subscribe
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of Housing Insecurity for Black Women
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn
The Human Impact of the Global Refugee Crisis Must Be Understood—And Acted Upon
Anmol Irfan
Black Americans Need Reparations: The Fight for the CTC Highlights the Roadblocks
Jhumpa Bhattacharya and Trevor Smith
Edgar Cahn’s Second Act: Time Banking and the Return of Mutual Aid
Steve Dubb

NPQ Webinars

April 27th, 2 pm ET

Liberatory Decision-Making

How to Facilitate and Engage in Healthy Decision-making Processes

Register Now
You might also like
Cancelling Student Debt Is Necessary for Racial Justice
Kitana Ananda
To Save Legal Aid, Expand Public Service Loan Forgiveness
Zoë Polk
No Justice, No Peace of Mind and Body: The Health Impacts of...
Jhumpa Bhattacharya, Maile Chand and Andrea Flynn

Like what you see?

Subscribe to the NPQ newsletter to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

See our newsletters

By signing up, you agree to our privacy policy and terms of use, and to receive messages from NPQ and our partners.

NPQ-Spring-2023-cover

Independent & in your mailbox.

Subscribe today and get a full year of NPQ for just $59.

subscribe
  • About
  • Contact
  • Advertise
  • Copyright
  • Careers

We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website.

 

Non Profit News | Nonprofit Quarterly
Powered by  GDPR Cookie Compliance
Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies so that we can provide you with the best user experience possible. Cookie information is stored in your browser and performs functions such as recognising you when you return to our website and helping our team to understand which sections of the website you find most interesting and useful.

Strictly Necessary Cookies

Strictly Necessary Cookie should be enabled at all times so that we can save your preferences for cookie settings.

If you disable this cookie, we will not be able to save your preferences. This means that every time you visit this website you will need to enable or disable cookies again.